5(b): How far were the roles of Bismarck and Cavour decisive in the unification of Germany and Italy?

Essay by iainUniversity, Bachelor'sB, December 2002

download word file, 8 pages ( 14 KB ) 2.6

Downloaded 73 times

When the Tsarist regime in Russia was overthrown and the Bolshevik party under Lenin ruled

as a single party government, it was claimed by many that a Marxist regime had been

established. Many within the Bolshevik party were firm believers in the Marxist theory and

thought that the Soviet state would agree with Marx's ideas. There are some modern

historians who agree with this view, embracing the ideas of equality and fraternity and

believing that the Soviet state was the living embodiment of these beliefs. There are also

those who see that the Soviet state was something quite different from what Marx and indeed

Lenin had intended it to be. To find out whether the Soviet state defied Marxist theory or not,

is hardly a simple task of comparing the elements of the Soviet state with that of an ideal

Marxist state. One must look at how the regime arose, and in what circumstances, how

popular it was, and whether it was an inevitable manifestation.

It is clear that the chief

coordinator of the revolution and founder of the movement, Vladimir Illyich Lenin died early

on in the regime. Therefore the change of rulers must be looked at closely to see whether

there were any major changes or internal disputes, which may cast doubt on the direction and

beliefs of the party. It is clear, therefore that to understand and assess whether the Soviet state

defied Marxist theory or not, one has to look at a number of features and assess their

importance. Perhaps also, it is worth considering how important Marxism is as an ideology,

that is to say, was it bound to fail? Has it ever succeeded in other regimes? If not then why

not? These are the issues that I will attempt to deal with in this...