Animal Testing - Necessary or Barbaric and Wrong? - Discursive Essay.
Animal testing has for a long time been a much debated moral issue. For many, this kind of testing has been the only kind of hope for developing new medicines and treatments for illness. For others, it is an unacceptable and unnecessary cruel way of exploiting animals for our own purposes. Treatments for illnesses such as tuberculosis, diabetes, kidney failure and asthma have all been discovered, and vaccinations against polio, diphtheria, tetanus and measles for example have all been found.
There are strict laws in place for using animals for testing and research purposes, so as to minimise any pain and distress the animals may encounter.
The Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 ensures that the usage of animals must be kept to a minimum and animals may only be used when no other method of testing is available.
The law states that the testing must be humane and only if no other method can be used in the particular procedure.
By "humane", the law means that painkillers and anaesthetics must be used when necessary, and if an animal is in severe pain it must be painlessly killed immediately to eliminate it's suffering.
The majority of animals used in research are mice, rats and other rodents. In fact, they make up around 84% of animals used. Animals more commonly used as pets, for example dogs and cats, make up only around 0.4% of animals used.
The reason animals are used is that they have more DNA similarities to a human than you would at first think. Their bodies will react in a similar way to a human body would to drugs. Also, rodents are easily cared for. Their short lifespan means that the long term effects of medicines can be seen more quickly. Animals are specially bred for use in testing.
More Animal Testing
essays:
Animal cruelty- This case is against the abuse of animals
... of animals in research testing would jeopardize the developments for medical breakthroughs. The AMP claim that without live animal testing, the vital components in developing new vaccines, surgical ...
Experimental animal testing.
... support animal testing may care deeply about animals but don't place them on an equal status with humans. Research on animals may be deemed necessary for a variety of reasons to develop vaccines and ...
Animal Testing.
... can animal testing benefit both animals and humans without harming the animals? BACKGROUND: For thousands of years, humans have used animals for a variety of purposes including food, clothing, labor, means of transportation, hunting, medicine, and ...
Animal Testing Wrong or Right?
... period. Animals are bred for the sole purpose of animal-testing, meaning they do not have any diseases. Humans that have used medicines that came from animal research are much healthier. Animal testing has ...
Animal testing
... to Medicine."Scientific American. 187 February 1997: 83-85. Carnell, Brian. "People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals."(06 March 2007): 16 October 2007. orD. E. "Skin Stand-Ins." Scientific American. September 1990: 168. James-Enger, Kelly. "Beyond Animal Testing." Vegetarian ...
Animals Rights
... be tested for medical purposes. Animal abuse is barbaric, unethical, and useless in this world today. Animal research and ...
Animal Cruelty
... in animal research. This is sadistic and wrong. Some governments are pushing for mandatory animal testing on ... walk afterwards. Vivisection is of course the live dissection of animals for scientific research, and is quite widespread in use today. Most of these ...
My Views on Animal Experimantation.
... free test methods. To help put an end to animal testing, people can stop buying products that were tested on animals, call ...