Augustine and Rousseau and the State of Human Nature
Both Jean Jacques Rousseau and Saint Augustine present two distinct, yet co-related accounts of the human being and the consequences of unrestrained human desire. All were great philosophers of their time, who offered various standpoints concerning the state of human nature. These great thinkers differed and shared certain similarities regarding their thoughts on the nature of the human being. Thus the purpose of this paper is to put forward a critical examination of the work of Augustine and Jean Rousseau and to prove without a doubt, in regards to the troubles of modern day man and significant events, that Saint Augustine's views toward mankind was in actuality a more accurate descriptive account. Saint Augustine offers a more reasonable solution to the troubles that plague mankind, in which that we are faced with a divine calling and we need to listen to that call.
Saint Augustine and Jean Rousseau presents specific varying views on the original state of the human being. Saint Augustine attempts to answer the question, what does it mean to be a human being? Throughout Augustine's life, he was in pursuit of something he did not know, this void in his life that he could not comprehend. Thus in this pursuit of happiness, Augustine eventually completely gave in to the desires of flesh, by engaging in various sexual activities and other sinful activities of the flesh. However, in the end, Augustine realized that nothing could fulfill that void, except for God. Human beings are the ultimate God seekers. We are always seeking something to fulfill that void in our life; there is always this hunger inside of us for meaning and understanding. As humans we are always discontent and in constantly seeking of fulfillment, and we tend to seek fulfillment and pleasure through finite goods such as money,