Autocratic vs. Democratic Leadership Styles
Leadership characteristics can be generalized as either autocratic or democratic. The autocratic leader tends to lead by authority and uses coercive power. Oppositely, the democratic leader will delegate authority and use expert and referent power to influence employees. One difference between a mechanistic structure and an organic structure in an organization is the chain of command. Similarly, a difference between an autocratic and a democratic leader is how decisions are made. At the one end of the spectrum, the autocratic side, the manager makes a decision and announces it. This is similar to the mechanistic organizational structure where there is a strict hierarchy of authority and the decision-making is centralized. At the other end of the spectrum, the democratic side, the manager defines limits but lets the group make the decision. This is similar to the organic organizational structure where the decision-making tends to be informal and decentralized within a relaxed hierarchy.
After matching the autocratic style with a mechanistic structured organization and the democratic style with an organic structured organization, it is clear that an autocratic or a democratic leader may have difficulty functioning in the oppositely structured organization. Beginning with the autocratic leader working in an organic organization, one major challenge may be learning to work on a team. Organic organizations tend to have many teams and task forces. An autocratic leader is most comfortable with just making a decision and announcing it, however in a team structure they will most likely have to 'sell' their decision to the group in order to get any response or action. Learning how to communicate and work along with employees could be the largest adjustment an autocratic leader would have to make in an organically structured organization.
At first, it seems easier for a democratic leader to adjust to working in a mechanistic organization. However the problem they will have to face is employees expecting direction and not getting a clear decision. In this case, the productivity is certain to go down because no one is making the decision. It may be hard for a democratic leader to get used to having to make decisions and then have to impose them on their employees.
Even though a leader's personality may be more autocratic or more democratic, ultimately leaders must adjust their style depending on the structure of the organization in which they work. Perhaps the best leader is the one that is able to adjust their style most timely and effectively
More Leadership and Communication
essays:
Democratic leadership is the best leadership style for today's workers. Discuss.
... All Leaders! Democratic Leadership Makes Us More Powerful [Online, assessed 6 Mar. 2004]. URL: http://www.geonewsletter.org/ed44cas.htm [4] James L. Gibson, John M. Ivancevich, and James H. Donnelly, Jr., Organizations: Structure, Processes ...
Leadership Paper: Styles, Organizational Culture, and Theories.
... with autocratic leadership and therefore have less trouble adopting that style. Furthermore, in some situations, subordinates may actually prefer an autocratic style. The democratic leader makes decisions by ...
MANAGAMENT LEADERSHIP
... The employees under the autocratic leader have difficult, weak, complicated and inconclusive connection system. This in fact because they have less self-control, strong structures and a large hierarchy. In contrast, since the employees under the democratic leader have ...
Leadership style: Meg Whitman, CEO of eBay one of the richest female CEOs in the world.
... As democratic leader: Meg Whitman leads by not leading, bosses by not bossing, and manages by not managing. Guided by Whitman, eBay is redefining the bedrock business principles, including leadership, that ...
Leadership styles and its appl
... more democratic and participate styles of leadership and such leadership styles should not be adopted just to show to the employees that they being included in the decision making, but should be introduced in its true spirit. The public sector leaders ...
Leadership Development at Afrox and Atlas Copco SA
... may influence motivation. The leader-member exchange (LMX) theory depicts the relationships that exist between a leader and his/her followers. These relationships may result in creating either an in-group (who the leader empowers and involve in decision making) or ...
Motivation and Leadership: A case study analysis.
... centralizes power and decision making in himself. The autocratic leaders take full authority and assume full responsibility.» (206-207). His leadership style is a directive one because as the book refers in ...
How does the management of people contribute to effective organisational behaviour, development and good health in respect of Leadership?
... s leadership function of motivating and inspiring is about "ensuring followers have sufficient energy to overcome obstacles" (1990, 2001). Leaders motivate by increasing the value of the work to the follower. Leaders often use involvement in decision making about ...