Among the foundations of Business Administration Theory, Porter's Business Strategies and Branding are unquestionably at top of the list. Other then their own significance for Business Management Processes these are basis of abundant intellectual work. Acknowledging the fact that theory some times not only misrepresent core idea but diverge with practical situation as well, its importance can not be denied.
This article too, is all about Theoretical dimensions of above identified concepts. Analysis shows, vice versa to the perfect strategic alignment between Differentiation and Branding, there is a blunt mismatch when a company with low Cost Business Strategy progresses towards BrandingDifferentiating products from that of competitors was probably the primary motive behind Brand initiative, as it is said, way back in 3000 B.C. MSN Encarta encyclopedia demonstrate brands as natural consequence of advertising that according to archeologists is evident among the Babylonians in 3000 BC. Despite of such ancient heredity, it was only 1990's when brand came at top of the priority list for strategy makers.
This article puts Brand Management into the framework of Business strategies proposed by Michel Porter. Starting from the introduction, it provides detailed comparison of both of these contemporary business hypotheses and in-depth analysis of variables having direct impact on these.
BUSINESS STRATEGIESMichel Porter, an economist before his specialization in "strategy" introduced generic strategies for organizations in 1980. By applying fundamental demand and supply functions of market into individual business setups he transpired two dimensions of a firm. The external demand size dimension was illustrated as "Strategic Scope" and internal Supply dimension as "Strength or Core Competence" of a firm. Rational behind it was Empirical research on the profit impact of market share that indicated firms with a high market share were often quite profitable, but so were many firms with low market share. Porter...