Comparative essay describing the ethics of Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas.
- Date: November 27, 2004
- Level: High School, 12th grade
- Grade: A
- Length: 4 pages (884 words)
- Essay rating:
- Keywords:
three philosophers, immanuel kant, emmanuel levinas, aristotle, ethical approaches, acting well, ...aim, according to the rules, human actions, good character, living well, optimism, wisdom, obligation
Hide extra keywords
Subject > Humanities Essays > Religion & Faith
Philosophers live and encourage others to live according to the rules of practical wisdom. Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas were three philosophers who sorted out various ethical approaches. They investigated complex human actions and theorized what is the ethical thing to do. For instance, Aristotle contemplated the aim of human life, Kant observed duty and obligation from respect for the law, and Levinas examined one's responsibility to the Other. These unique points of view offer different answers regarding the search for the good. In addition to their differences, these philosophers are bound together by similar ideas. For example, each of the philosophers believed in optimism-- they thought that all humans are naturally ethical. In addition, each of the philosophers ...

... and provide it hospitality. Thus, the face becomes ethical. He had this whole idea of promoting freedom rather than limiting it. He believed that the face is a "trace of God" that refuses to use power. Instead, the face calls one to be responsible by humbly beckoning those that passes by. Kant also had similar theories as Levinas because both of them emphasized that God is necessary for a person to act ethically. In other words, they included God in their search for the good. Kant believed one cannot do this without God, whereas Levinas believed humans are motivated by God to do good. With the concept of the Other, Levinas suggested that humans have 
essay continues for another 100 words