A critical appraisal on the article by John A. Cross titled, Megacites and small towns: Different perspectives on hazard vulnerability.

Essay by sexytrishUniversity, Bachelor'sA+, February 2004

download word file, 5 pages 3.4

Downloaded 71 times


"In a world of uncertainty, the only constant is change and rapid change produces a

multitude of diverse facts." Risk is an integral part of life and it is based on a combination of

hazard and vulnerability. Over the past couple of decades, considerable attention has been placed

upon the studies of hazards and their mitigation processes. While no country in the world is

entirely safe, the lack of capacity to limit the impact of hazards remains a major burden for many

countries. Since the world has witnessed an exponential increase in human and material losses

due to natural and technological disasters, a need to reverse trends in hazard vulnerability exists.

The journal article by John A. Cross titled "Mega cities and small towns: different perspectives

on hazard vulnerability" closely reflected the idea of how small towns are more vulnerable to

hazards compared to megacities, due to their lack of resources, money, government interest and

numerous other factors.

At first glance, the article seemed well researched and discussed,

but further consideration proved otherwise. John Cross's failure to consider recent events

surrounding hazard vulnerability such as changing population demographics, the emergence of

new un-natural hazards and the current discussions on hazard mitigation created a major flaw,

which subsequently diminished the quality of his article.


John Cross's argument defined small towns as being more vulnerable to hazards than

megacities. He argued this statement by reflecting on the sense that disasters can result in equally

high percentages of deaths and economic losses among the populations of small towns compared

to those of megacities. Remoteness, isolation, openness, limited diversification, poverty and

limited capacity are factors that characterize rural communities as vulnerable. Thus the extent of

the town's vulnerability is determined by the...