I Introduction
II Animal Intelligience
A. Ameslan
1. Washoe
2. Lucy
B. Yerkish
1. Lana
2. Trainer incident
III Animal activists groups
A. PETA
1. Formed when and by whom
2. Purpose
B. ALF
1. Formed when and by whom
2. Purpose
C. PPF
1. Formed when and by whom
2. Purpose
Outline
IV Pros and cons of animal rights
A. Positive effects
B. Negative effects
V. Conclusion
'Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; The Declaration of Independence holds these rights to be self evident and unalienable. In the eighteenth century when these words were written they were called natural rights, today we call them human rights' (McShea 34). The issue of whether or not to grant animal rights such as those that humans retain, is a greatly disputed issue. Philosophers, clergyman, and politicians have argued the point of animal rights for years, but without success. Animal right is an extremely intricate issue that involves the question of animal intelligence, animal activist groups, and the pros and cons of granting animals their rights.
Psychologists around the world, who have studied nonhuman primates, argue that these animals possess the capacity to communicate. They go on to explain that a communication barrier is all that separates humans from animals. If they bridged that barrier, then humans could talk with animals. Beatrice and Robert Gardner, two psychologists of the University of Nevada, realized that the pharynx and larynx of the chimpanzee are not suited for human speech. Since chimpanzees are far superior to humans in manual dexterity, the Garners decided to try to teach chimpanzees American Sign Language or Ameslan. The Gardners and others studied these chimpanzees, Washoe, Lucy, and Lana. These three chimpanzees learned to use and could display a working vocabulary of 100 to 200 words. They also distinguished between...
Animal rights
Pretty good essay, though a bit weak on the implications for the future if animal rights were to be put into law. Also, there is no discussion of any modified approach between the extremes of full animal rights or none. Clearly North American society will not in our life times go full animal rights, so a discussion of compromise positions that might be workable seems called for.
4 out of 6 people found this comment useful.