Discuss with reference to the 'rules' and examples of the operation of precedent and statutory interpretation.
The statement seems at first glance to offer a much generalised and often contested view of the separation of powers embodied in constitutional theory. That is to say that Parliament makes laws and the judiciary as slaves to the rules, should simply apply them to a particular case. This perhaps is what 'ought' to happen, according to the fundamental nature of rules and the impression that word 'rule' renders; i.e. that following a particular pattern cannot lead you astray. However the broader implications of this narrow position is that judge's decisions are straightforward and mechanistic in appearance, which as we shall see in the operation of precedent and of statutory interpretation, could not be further from the truth.
The obvious starting point for this piece of writing is to state that the rules governing statutory interpretation and precedent 'should' be foolproof. After all, anything contrary to this would call into question Parliamentary Sovereignty and it's competence in performing its legislative functions. But to submit to the assumption that judges adjudicate only according to the rules leaves us open to much criticism.
However practical and appealing, an approach of simply looking up the law and applying it, may be, it is important to understand that there are no fixed rules of law written in stone, like modern day commandments, which judges can simply draw authority from, and prescribe to a legal problem. Legal rules are composed by men and thus by their most fundamental orthodox, are flawed in some way due to man's imperfectness. I.e. no matter how elaborately it is phrased, no legislator can hope to create a rule to cater for every possible situation arising for future consideration, and legislate to facilitate it. Even if they could, constraints upon draftsmen's time amongst other factors such as the legal compatibility...
More Law
essays:
Discuss with reference to ethnic conflict in the Caucasus, Russia's war with Chechnya. Your discussion must cite specific aspects of the conflict and lead up to the war in 1994.
... Drugs, Power: Other theories of the War. In this article he discusses the nature of Chechen ... areas of upper Chechnya" (Lieven, 1998: 25 - 27). Contrary to the belief that Chechens were always a Muslim people, Chechens had started to ...
When would discretion be justifiable in Rule of Law? Discuss with reference to Ant-terrorism and the Haneef case.
... Australia, Parliamentary debates, Senate: Official Hansard, 9 August 2007, 1 (Senator Andrew John Julian Bartlett)26. Lynch Andrew, 'A Triumph for the Law,'(2007) The Age at 13 September 2007Therefore the information that was at the hand of the judiciary was ...
Why is there so much disagreement about the meaning of the rule of law? Illustrate your answer with reference to at least two rule of law theorists.
... Parliament expresses it?s opinion greatly increases the authority of the judges in the constitution. The second main reason why there is no conflict between the 2 principles is that the supremacy of the law necessitates the exercise of Parliamentary sovereignty ...
A Level Playing Field for All? The Law's Response to On and Off-the-ball Incidents at Football Matches
... still constitutes an offence throughout Great Britain it would appear as though the days of being ... liability of footballers is the Scottish common law offence of breach of the peace and its statutory equivalent in England. It will first be ...
Give a brief analysis of current banking regulation within the United Kingdom, with particular reference to the threat of systemic risk.
... which sets regulatory requirements which are precisely calibrated to the nature of risks posed by an individual firm, to the financial system ... better risk management techniques in monitoring and managing their risks" . Firstly banks should have a suitable process for assessing their overall ...
A) Explain how lay magistrates and district judges (magistrate's court) are selected and appointed. b) Identify and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the use of lay magistrates.
... would start off by doing two years training as a district judge; this would be in order to gain experience, to prepare you. The usual age of retirement for a district judge is 70, and the Lord Chancellor has the power ...
Do You Consider that the Introduction of the Citizen's Charter/Service First Initiatives Over the Past Decade Have Made Any Improvements to the Law of Public Administration ?
... effect of the Service First ideals has been to raise the public's expectations about the standard which public agencies should meet. This, as a result, has led to an increase in complaints to the Parliamentary Commissioner ...
An essay on the International Criminal Court, with a mark of 18.75/20. Including- Overview, History, Jurisdiction, Structure, Rights of the accused and Current Cases
... the sovereignty of nation states, the war crimes jurisdiction covers internal as well as international conflicts affecting India due to its dispute with Pakistan over Kashmir. The United States has not signed the treaty citing that it denies fundamental American ...