The distinction between insanity, automatism and diminished responsibility in the Laws of England and Wales. Covers the M'Naghten rule which is also a dominant rule in US legal doctrine.
"The defendant who seeks to avoid criminal liability on the basis that s/he was suffering from a mental disorder at the time of the alleged crime must have a defence that falls within one of the following, legally recognised, categories: Insanity, Diminished Responsibility or Automatism. While, at one level or another, these "mental disorder defences" share common characteristics, they each differ significantly. Unfortunately, this point does not appear to be fully appreciated in English Law."
Discuss the validity of this statement.
Inherent in our legal system is an idea of culpability. The word itself embodies notions of moral responsibility and blame. There are two elements that will allow us to determine whether or not someone is to be considered culpable. The first is that the person on whom we wish to apportion blame is an actual agent of harm as opposed to a mere causer. That is to say that they are instrumental in an action and are not simply a victim of a spasm or similar associated condition. The second is that he/she has the capacity to understand the laws and moral order that exist within society. Hart's principles of justice assert that 'a moral license to punish is needed by society and unless a man has the capacity and fair opportunity or chance to adjust his behaviour to the law, its penalties ought not be applied to him." Such deep-rooted notions of culpability have necessitated development in the area of defences to ensure that those who fall outside of the legally recognised parameters of accountability are afforded 'protection'. Amongst such defences are Insanity, Automatism and Diminished responsibility. This essay will identify the similarities and differences of these defences by exploring their theoretical foundations and determine whether, in practice, they are sufficiently understood by the courts to achieve their...
Reviews of: "The distinction between insanity, automatism and diminished responsibility in the Laws of England and Wales. Covers the M'Naghten rule which is also a dominant rule in US legal doctrine."
:
More Law
essays:
Basic Functions of Law in Australia
... 4.) Criminal liability refers to the job of the prosecutor, they must prove the two elements before the defendant can ... from offenders) and to rehabilitate offenders and reinforce their social responsibilities. 9.) A civil wrong is an act or a failure ...
Insanity
... that criminal responsibility must include the mental (intent) as well as physical (action) capability to perform the act, it is imperative that we now reach agreement on the fact that mental disorders are ...
Canon Law
... the insane and other serious mental disorders. As we had pointed out earlier, the basic question that faces the judges here is whether a person concerned had the ability to consent, or whether the condition from which he suffered removed ...
The morality of Capital Punishment
... the criminal is a moral person with responsibilities, responsibilities to ... only valid to some extent. Many times, victims have been kidnapped and kept at the will of the murderer for several days if not weeks. Even if it is only a few hours, they still suffer with ...
The Evolution of Criminal Law: From the Common Law to Modern Statutes and the Model Penal Code
... two elements, which make them unique. One, there must be a strong public policy reason for eliminating the mens rea from a specific crime; and two, the penalties for transgression are generally significantly lower than for typical offenses. While strict liability ...
Criminality……Are Criminals Born, or Made?
... assess criminality and law enforcement's response from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, one must consider many variables, some of which, while having significant impact ...
A Level Playing Field for All? The Law's Response to On and Off-the-ball Incidents at Football Matches
... s Response to Sportsfield Violence," [1997] Crim LR 41 McCall Smith, "Violence in Sport," [1978] JLSS 441 Gary Neville, "Heroes or Villains? A Player's View," The Times, February 19th, 2000 Ulrick O'Connor, "Billinghurst and Criminal Liability," Sunday ...
Capital punishment
... equality of giving and receiving. Mutual love has a justice element in which every person has an equal claim to fulfillment and an equal duty to be responsible. Ethical love is unconditional and will reach out to others ...
Grading
the grade 67% is not a poor grade in the U.K. The maximum given for a piece of work at my law school is 80%. Usually only a handful of people will score above 70%.
6 out of 6 people found this comment useful.