To what extent can Tybalt truely be blamed for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet.

Essay by jamdevilHigh School, 10th grade December 2005

download word file, 3 pages 4.0

Downloaded 14 times

Tybalt is shown as a villain in Romeo and Juliet but how much can he really be blamed?

Tybalt is a proud and patriotic Capulet cousin, his name reflects his personality (tybalt means the prince of cats) he is a rare swordsman and fights with honor, although he does take personal insults very far he can be viewed in two ways, first as a racist, prejudiced against the Montagues or second as an honorable man who fights for family and what he believes to be right, Mercoutio describes him as

"More than prince of cats, I can tell you. O, he is

the courageous captain of compliments. He fights

as you sing prick-song, keeps time, distance, and

proportion; rests me his minim rest, one, two, and the

third in your bosom: the very butcher of a silk button,

a duellist, a duellist; a gentleman of the very first

house, of the first and second cause," (2.4.26)

In scene 1 act 1 Rioting has broken out between the two families, Tybalt must be held responsible for turning down an offer of peace from the Montagues,

"What, drawn, and talk of peace! I hate the word,

As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee:

Have at thee, coward!" (1.1.72)

However following the riot Tybalt and indeed all Capulets and Montagues are issued a warning that if violence is broken out again someone will pay the price

"If ever you disturb our streets again,

Your lives shall pay the forfeit of the peace." (1.1.97)

In this Tybalt does receive a warning so although he can be blamed for exacerbating a fight in act 1 scene 1 he cannot be further punished.

Some would believe that Tybalt does not really listen to the Princes warning which shows a lack of respect for...