In some cases, deforestation can be beneficial. Given the right mix of social needs, economic opportunities, and environmental conditions, it can be a rational conversion from one type of land use to a more productive one. It can lead to highways of communication being created. Minerals that bring a country much needed capital can be used to create a better life for the peoples of that country. In the long term these activities may be fuelling Brazil's advance into a major trading power. These are far reaching and all encompassing effects. The tragedy lies in the fact that most lands that have been deforested in recent decades are not suited for long-term farming or ranching and they quickly degrade once the forest has been cut and burnt. Unlike the fertile soils of temperate latitudes, most tropical forest soils cannot sustain annual cropping. The carrying capacity of the soil will not support intensive annual cropping without rapid, irreversible degradation.
Many regions in Cameroon are particularly mountain...
English: Slash and burning in Brazil
Deforestation in EcuadorSimilarly, intensive cattle grazing cannot be supported because grasses grown on forest soils do not have the same productivity levels as those on arable soils. In fact, there are very few forested soils in developing countries today that are available for future agricultural expansion, underscoring the urgent need to increase agricultural production on existing farmlands rather than converting more forests to farms.
In many cases, political decision-makers knowingly permit deforestation to continue because it acts as a social and economic safety valve. By giving people free access to forested lands, the pressure is taken off politicians to resolve the more politically sensitive problems that face developing countries, such as land reform, rural development and power-sharing. However it means conflicts spring up between groups in the rainforests .Conservationist and loggers go head to head. Miners and drillers may clash over a piece of...