When looking at immigration to the United States, it is important to notice the difference between the ÃÂÃÂold immigrantsÃÂÃÂ and the ÃÂÃÂnew immigrantsÃÂÃÂ in terms of sociocultural, socioeconomic, and spatial factors. Not only are immigrants migrating to different cities than during the turn-of-the-century, they also definitely look and speak differently than the average American citizen, and in addition todayÃÂÃÂs immigrants are not necessarily poor, low-skilled, and uneducated as most ÃÂÃÂold immigrantsÃÂÃÂ were. Some social scientists maintain that these differences between these immigrant generations makes comparisons unrealistic and unfavorable, yet it is still done during debates of immigration all the time. The image of the poor, uneducated, and unskilled ÃÂÃÂhuddled massesÃÂÃÂ depicted on Ellis Island does not necessarily apply to contemporary immigrants.
One of the largest, and most obvious, differences between these two waves of migration stems from the respective places of origin that these two waves came from. During European immigration at the turn-of-the-century almost all immigrants had white skin like the rest of the United States; now most immigrants are people of color coming from Mexico, China, Latin America, the Caribbean, and other nations, making their presence more visible and drastically different than immigration was in the past.
Another sociocultural factor, stemming from place of origin, that makes these two waves of migration so different is the fact that most of todayÃÂÃÂs immigrants come from the Third World, or non-Western nations, and their cultural traditions and ideals donÃÂÃÂt match with those of Anglo-European origin, which are dominant in the United States.
Also important to notice when comparing turn-of-the-century immigration with that of today is that around 1900 the United States of America was a relatively new country that was still forging its identity; in 1910, 15 of every 100 Americans were foreign-born . Nowadays, in 2006, the United States...