The Palestinians have the right to resist Zionism and the occupation of the rogue State of Israel.

i agree with u, if only ppl saw wut really goes on over there then they will really understand, i think u did a good job, but u could have talked a lil more, and added more opions of ur own since u did say this is not in essay form, but others wise very good.

I can tolerate intelligent debate over sensitive topics; in fact, I welcome it. However, this drivel is so incohesive and unfocused that I was offended on an intellectual level, apart from the gross oversimplification of such a complex subject.

This paper cannot be a help to anyone, and I suggest that it be removed lest some unfortunate soul find himself dumber for reading it.

A rogue state is a state that is blatantly in violation of international law. Israel violates the Geneva Convention on a daily basis. Over 200 resolutions have been passed by the United Nations condemning Israel for it's harassment and oppression of the Palestinian people. The Hague (International Court) has declared the Israeli "security barrier" illegal. Israel is also the ONLY country in the Middle East that possesses nuclear weapons. For all of these reasons, Israel is a rogue state. And when you use plural subject, the correct verb conjugation is "are", not to mention your numerous spelling errors. Also, don't confuse the war on terrorism with the Palestinian-Israeli conflict: while many people may be driven to attack America due to American support of Israel, Israel is in no way helping to fight the war on terror. I don't see Israeli soldiers fighting in Afghanistan, do you? Israel is only serving to increase the hatred many have for America due to it's brutality and utter violation of human decency and international law. Also, if you knew anything about Zionism, you would know that it calls for ALL of the land to become Jewish- including the West Bank and Gaza (a.k.a. Judea and Samaria). So before you attack me for being biased (which I clearly stated upon beginning this entry) and for being factually incorrect, maybe you should read a history book. Thanks.

Help me understand how this work got any positive feedback. There is no arguement contained here, just a random collection of facts, not all of which support the author's original (although left unfounded) claim.

As I stated above, this is not meant to be an essay. It is an opinionated blurb. A blurb is a compilation of facts along with opinion. I expressed my opinion and used facts to back it up. I described the background of the conflict (WWI) in order for the uneducated (people like yourself, judging by your inability to understand this piece) to have some understanding of this amazingly complex topic.