Pledge in schools
Reciting the pledge at school is something that many people have grown up with. It has been part of the daily routine at many schools for years. While the majority of students proudly stood with his or her right hand over his or her heart and recited the pledge, there was occasionally one or two that sat or stood quietly during the process. But that was ok; nobody really thought much of it. It was understood that while reciting the pledge was strongly encouraged, it was not mandatory. (In 1943 the U.S. Supreme Court had ruled that children may not be compelled to recite the Pledge.) Very few -if any- of the students ever gave the meaning of the words much thought, it was just something that was said because they lived in America and were proud of it. To take the Pledge of Allegiance out of schools now would be a terrible blow to this country and promote discord at a time we need unity.
On June 27, 2002, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco
banned the Pledge of Allegiance in schools citing the phrase "under god" as unconstitutional. The court said, "The Pledge, as currently codified, is an impermissible government endorsement of religion because it sends a message to unbelievers 'that they are outsiders, not full members of the political community, and an accompanying message to adherents that they are insiders, favored by members of the political community.'"(CNN PG2) It was also stated by Judge Goodwin, writing for the majority,
that the school district is " conveying a message of state endorsement of religious belief when it requires public school teachers to recite, and lead the recitation of the current form of the pledge." "Given the age and impressionability of school...
Kind of Offensive
As an atheist I can tell you that the phrases "under God", "IGWT", and "God bless you" have certainly not lost their real meaning. If the word God in those phrases was replaced with the word Zues would it ever lose its meaning with you? I doubt it.
You also mentioned that God is mentioned in the founding documents. This is irrelevent for two reasons. Firstly, we are a much more religiously diverse country then we were then. We don't have to follow everything the founders said. Seconly the phrase "in the year of our Lord" was simply conventional dating practice. It is still used today as AD. The AD in front of a date means "anno Domini" which is Latin for "in the year of our lord". There is nothing special about it, it's just the normal dating method. The founders also used the days and months in the Constitution. Do you think that they meant to promote the pagan gods?
January= the god Janus
Thursday= the god Thor
Your other example (so help me God) is not required to be said either in Court or in the Presidential oath.
Finally, Jeffersons references to God in the Constitution represent the deistic God and not the Christian one. Besides, we are not governed by the Declaration of Independence.
2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.