This is a prompt my social studies teacher gave me and my response aganist juvinille exectution.
Imagine you are a Supreme Court Justice. The case before you deals with at what age criminals should be subject to the death penalty. As a Supreme Court Justice you are asked to issue a clear-cut verdict supporting or against the issue. Write an essay persuading your fellow Justices to side with your verdict.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights oppose executing a juvenile. There has been thirteen juvenile offenders executed in the past five years. The United States is one of five countries in the world to ever execute a juvenile and one of two that continue to do so. So why do the United States continue to send sixteen and seventeen-year-old minors to death row? The age of criminals that would be subjected to the death penalty should be eighteen because it is otherwise considered cruel and unusual punishment as well as unconstitutional.
According to the Constitution, a child is defined as under the age of eighteen. The Constitution also states that children are guaranteed the right to have basic nutrition and social services. Children are also guaranteed protection from maltreatment, neglect and other abuse. Having a minor executed would defiantly be in the category of maltreatment and abuse.
Aside from the fact that it is unconstitutional to give a minor the death penalty, psychiatric, David Fassier, M.D, also opposes it. He argues that because the brain of a teenager functions differently from an adult it does not have the same ability to reason, think, and control impulses. "For example, they tend to rely more on these instinctual structures, like the amygdala, and less on more advanced areas, like the frontal lobes, which are associated with more goal oriented and rational thinking.
People supporting the execution of children may...
More Death Penalty
essays:
The Ineffectiveness of the Death Penalty in our Legal System
... the death penalty as an infringement on civil and human rights and freedoms. Amnesty International has listed 4 in existance today, they are: the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Human Rights, the ...
This is a presuasive essay on Capital Punishment. This essay has a pro-capital punishment stance. Argues against common statements used to challenge the death penalty.
... over the decades. The United States Supreme Court decided in Furman v. Georgia that the death penalty was a form of cruel and unusual punishment. However, just three years later in 1975, the Supreme ...
This is a persuasive essay on the death penalty.
... a country like ours which values mercy, morality and justice. Some people say that the death penalty is immoral, that killers have a right to ...
Is the Death Penalty right or wrong?
... worked and inexperienced to be of adequate assistance to the accused anyway. The final reason that the death penalty should be abolished is that it is cruel and unusual punishment. To ...
Unlawful Justice; It is about the death penalty and how it is wrong.
... abolish the death penalty. Many innocent people are killed and a lot of jurors are racist and judge the crime poorly. Almost half of the countries in the world have ...
The Death Penalty Debate
... criminal justice system. However since the later half of 20th century, most countries in the world have abolished the death penalty completely or in practice. Capital punishment is mainly a communal ethical issue, as there are at least two viewpoints and ...
Should the Use of the Death Penalty be banned from the United States Justice System?
... people on death row in thirty-eight states that support and carry out the death penalty while only twelve states have outlawed it. At the same time, more than half the countries in the world have ...
The Death Penalty Process.
... Court on the case of Furman V Georgia. The justices decided that executions were cruel and unusual punishment and therefore a violation of the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. In 1976, the Court ...