Send Boat People Straight Back
July 6, 2004
The issue of refugees had one that has been lingering in the headlines for some time. The community is split on whether or not it is Australia's responsibility to address the growing issue of allowing refugees into our country. Some say we should simply "send them back", others argue that it is our moral responsibility as a community to care for asylum seekers. However, regardless of how strong the cases put forward are, one thing's for sure, unless we come to some sort of country agreement, the problem of refugees will continue to remain strong.
In the text, "Send Boat people Straight Back", we see the writer, John Vaughan, clearly state his stance on the refugee issue. He believes that we, as a society, should be able to send refugees back home, ensuring that money allocated to this problem is better spent in areas concerned with the people of Australia.
Although only short, the persuasive techniques used throughout the text are successful in manipulating the reader's response to the issue at hand.
One way that the author persuades the reader to agree with his stance is the use of emotive language. In basic terms this is the deliberate use of strong emotive words to play on the reader's feelings. Such examples of words used throughout the piece include, "heartbreaking", "queue jumpers" and "desperately". These words are all intentionally used to stimulate strong emotional reactions that manipulate the reader's response. We feel angry and annoyed at the thourght that "our" money is being used to cater for impatient individuals that want to jump ahead of the system, wasting our money and resources in the process.
Yet another example of a persuasive technique used is the rhetorical question. A rhetorical question is one...
Asylum Seekers
This was a concise and well written analysis on a topic that I feel incredibly strongly about.
It is a very sad indictment on our society that such a large proportion of Australians actually agree with the mindless concept of sending refugees 'back where they came from'. The issue is a complex one and has been oversimplified by the current government who have successfully used the same sort of scaremongering and emotive language that you talk about in your review of John Vaughan's book.
I would really have been interested to hear views on the issue and how they relate to the book. I am hopeful that views such as Vaughan's are losing support as the majority of asylum seekers need our compassion rather than our negative and often ignorant judgements of them.
Thank you for raising an interesting topic!
3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.