Imagine being at a nice restaurant, waiting to enjoy a great meal. Leaning in to takethat first bite, a puff of reeking cigarette smoke surrounds the food, and it is not verypleasant. A debatable topic that has brought on numerous attention is whether or notsmoking should be banned in public areas in Ontario, such as restaurants. Smoking inpublic areas should be taken into great consideration. There are three significant reasonswhy this is brought to attention. Firstly, smoking can have harmful effects on theenvironment. Secondly, it endangers people's health and thirdly, it can negatively affectthe lifestyles of the members of society.
Smoking public places should be prohibited because, because it is important forsociety to learn about the dangerous effects smoking can have on the environment.
Whether individuals of society choose to disclaim it or not, it is a well-known fact thatsmoking causes air pollution. According to the University of Chicago Medical Center, airpollution is the presence of noxious substances in the air that people breathe.
English: Smoking any tobacco product, %, Females
its hard keeping this one on one hand and the came...
English: This photo illustrates smoke in a pub, a ...Cigarettesin this case, contain a great deal of toxic gases such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen dioxideand methane among other gases. Smokers fail to release that by smoking cigarettes, theyonly help release these gases in the atmosphere, which contribute to global warming. Thetobacco industries are extremely unhelpful in diminishing the factors that smokingnegatively effectuates on the environment. These industries use 450 pesticides that poseserious risks to the environment, ultimately poisoning the air and water both humans andanimals need to survive. In conclusion, members of society, particularly smokers, need torealize that by banning smoking in all public areas in Ontario, less toxic fumes flows inthe atmosphere, and a healthy environment is established for non-smokers and children.
The primary reason as to why the Ontario government wishes to interdict smokingin public areas is because oh health issues.
Smoke
Let me begin by stating that I am an anti-smoker, one who harbors a strong antipathy towards smokers, and a well-developed distaste for second-hand smoke and the insensitive clods who spew it out. Given that basic attitude, I would like to comment favorably on this essay, but I cannot.
First, this essay is filled with examples of deplorable English usage. To point out just a few:
"A debatable topic that has brought on numerous attention"
"Smoking in public areas should be taken into great consideration"
"Smoking public places should be prohibited because, because"
"Smokers fail to release"
"tobacco industries are extremely unhelpful in diminishing the factors that smoking
negatively effectuates on the environment."
"cigarettes pose only pose as a threat"
In short, it is very badly written.
Secondly, there is an assumption running throughout this essay, that no one but the author realizes how very bad cigarette smoke is. It has the sound of a street preacher, talking about religion as if no one has even the vaguest idea about the subject. It is a condescending attitude, and one that does not make for a good essay.
3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.