'Terrorism flourishes with global inequalities'. Throughout geographic history periods of extreme wealth and poverty have resulted in social arrest, conflict over land and resources and acts of violence. Is the current wave of terrorism a result of economic dominance?
'Terrorism is too anaesthetic a word. It is barbaric, brutal mass murder without justification...Terrorism can strike anyone, anywhere, anytime.' Prime Minister John Howard. 14 October, 2002. Any connection between poverty, education, and terrorism is indirect, complicated, and probably quite weak. Instead of viewing terrorism as a direct response to low market opportunities or lack of education, we suggest it is more accurately viewed as a response to political conditions and long-standing feelings of indignity and frustration (perceived or real) that have little to do with economics. To state that the current wave of terrorism is a result of economic dominance and global inequalities is invalid and is backed up with very little factual evidence.
Rather, there are several other factors that quite obviously contribute to the worldwide issue of terrorism, however the most prominent and justified is religion.
Terrorism is defined by the Oxford Dictionary as a 'policy or system of ruling, seeking to obtain political demands ect by violence and intimidation. Terrorism has been part of the political life of many countries for centuries, though it may not have gone under the name of terrorism, but rather murder, espionage or war. The cause of terrorism has always been a topic of discussion, more so since the September 11 attacks on America and the October 12 attacks in Bali but obviously no one reason can be given for the root of terrorism.
Any connection between poverty, education, and terrorism is indirect, complicated, and probably quite weak. Instead of viewing terrorism as a direct response to low market opportunities or...