Why was the Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb Justified? Works Cited included
The year was 1945. Germany had surrendered, and Japan was the only Axis power left. After the Potsdam conference, President Truman realized that he had the power to end the war. The decision was his. On August 6, Truman authorized the use of the atomic bomb, the first of its kind in existence. Truman was justified in the use of the atomic bomb, for many reasons. The dropping of the bomb would save American lives, make a quick end to the war, and keep the Soviets from joining the war.
By the end of World War II, around 300,000 American soldiers had been killed in combat, and no one wanted the death count to rise. Operation Olympia, a full-scale attack on the Japanese mainland, would only result in more casualties. The atomic bomb presented a way to remotely battle the Japanese, with no American casualties. Henry L. Stimson expected that the war could cost many lives, as he wrote in his memoir, "...I was informed that such operations might be expected to cost over a million casualties, to American forces alone."
"When Air Force chief General Hap Arnold asked in June 1945 when the war was going to end, the commander of the B-29 raids, General Curtis LeMay, told him September or October 1945, because by then they would have run out of industrial targets to bomb." By 1945, the war had been raging for six years. Many Americans had been killed, with almost no end in sight, and many thought that the war could last many more months, only ending when the military ran out of targets. Even with frequent air attacks and a naval blockade, the Japanese refused to surrender. After the two bombs were dropped, the Japanese Cabinet met and voted, resulting in a non unanimous vote,
Reviews of: "Why was the Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb Justified? Works Cited included"
:
As falkorlove said, though you did mention Stimson, anyone who doesn't know who he is, wouldn't know why you did.
-Also, I don't know why the first sentence of your 3rd paragraph is in quotes.
-The follwoing statement is unnecessary: When Germany was defeated and split up, the Soviet Union received ¼ of the country, and ¼ of the capital, Berlin. Now that Japan was almost defeated, the U.S. did not want to share the country, especially with a communist nation.
--I don't even know why you mentioned it. It's just babble.
I can't say this is anywhere near C material. If I gave this to my teacher (I am in 9th grade too) she wouldn't even take the time to put a grade on it after reading the first two paragraphs.
I've seen better..Ive seen worse...a read thru when you finished could have def fixed up alot. This is C material at best
More World War II
essays:
Why did the Allies Drop the Atomic Bomb in Japan? The war was nearly end, there was no need to drop the atomic bombs. A bomb could have been enough, but they dropped two.
... US dropped the two atomic bombs simultaneously, rather than waiting for Japanese to surrender. Admiral Leahy, US navy, advisor of President Truman in 1945 commented ... of the arms race between US and Uni Soviet. Generally speaking, the dropping of the atomic bombs cannot be called as the reflection of ...
The Decision to Drop the Atom Bomb on Hiroshima
... Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan was absolutely the right decision. Not only did it stop Japan from becoming a threat to world peace, but it saved American lives. If he hadn't dropped the bomb, the ...
Was it necassary to drop the bombs on Japan in 1945? YES!
... the casualties from previous battles and rightly decided the bombs must be dropped. The American authorities saw the danger and possible loss of life in the siege of the Japanese mainland because of the Japanese's ...
Was is necessary to drop the A bomb on Hiroshima?
... the Japanese. The use of any bomb is never good, it will always bring suffering. However without the atomic bomb, the casualties on both sides would have been much greater than the deaths caused ...
The Decision That Changed America
... many casualties at Pearl Harbor. Japan may have received a greater attack than they gave us, but it was the best decision for America at the time. "They (the Japanese) have been repaid many fold." (President Truman). Though ...
Should we have drop the atom bomb
... by President Truman as they probably should have been but because these alternatives were never explored we can only guess whether or not Truman's decision to drop atomic bombs was a possible savior of American casualties and ...
The Development of the Atomic Bomb and its Impact on WWII
... surrender. Truman realized that the Japanese invasion plan, Operation Olympic, would cost a great deal of American lives and the chance for failure still existed. The atomic bomb could ... a bomb.'(p.34 The History of the Atomic Bomb) Eventually a letter was sent to president Roosevelt ...
The Bomb
... the death" (Henry L. Stimson, Harper's Magazine, http://www.aasianst.org/EAA/StimsonHarpers.pdf. November 1, 2006). Stimson, Truman and others believed the invasion of the Japanese mainland would be extremely costly, and therefore embraced the bomb as ...
Hello
I would give your essay a c+ or B-
-you mention the reasons as to why the US did not want the Soviets to enter the war after talking about the bombs being dropped. You should go in chronological order.
-Henry L. Stimson ... It is very nice that you mention Stimson, a very important person in the situation, however, you need to mention who Stimson is and why his opinion matters.
-Also, to make your essay interesting you could have cited reasons for opposition then written evidence agianst that opposition
3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.