some fantastic points, like the one about goebbel's diary, a biblio. would have been great.
- 06/09/2004
- 08:49:26
- Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
Reasonable essay, but lots of loose ends (greek - relevance?), useful for looking up critics of leni, biblio. would have been good.
- 06/09/2004
- 08:40:17
- Score: 3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
...for the essay, and particularly the biblio., will come in handy.
- 06/09/2004
- 08:35:01
- Score: 2 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
accurate in relation to Munch's life, (http://www.munch.museum.no) analysis clearly written. The first authentically inspiring essay I've read on this site.
- 08/07/2004
- 04:49:30
- Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
Can I get a bibliography?
- 09/06/2004
- 06:04:57
- Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
But can I get the footnotes/bibliography?
- 09/06/2004
- 05:46:04
- Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
Very interesting though not very well explained in the duchamp section, difficult to read.Your understanding of chance in surrealist process is spot on.Hans Belmer, not Balmer and he began making his dolls in isolation from other artists, so it is not entirely accurate that Ernst paved the way for Belmer.
- 09/06/2004
- 04:09:49
- Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
Nothing to do with surrealism but a pretty good essay.
- 09/06/2004
- 03:10:47
- Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
This essay is only maginally accurate, but it doesn't purport to be a definitive analysis.
- 09/06/2004
- 03:05:59
- Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.