Your official stance on the topic was? This looks like it might was supposed to be a concession essay gone bad. Addressing both sides of a topic is important, but you need to stick to one point and not jump around so much. Re-organize this, and you have an excellent paper.
- 23/02/2005
- 21:33:33
- Score: 4 out of 9 people found this comment useful.
1] well written2]not so well researched/cited (use MLA)3]intresting4]relevantQuestion: Did you really make a 100% on this or are you polishing a little on that? I find it a little hard to believe that any profesor would be quite so lenient with the poor works cited.
- 23/02/2005
- 21:23:41
- Score: 0 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
I just took phyc. last semester and I've never heard of any of this stuff before. My dual participation professor is pretty up to date...
- 15/02/2005
- 19:35:20
- Score: 1 out of 5 people found this comment useful.
You are in the same grade I am and I don't think I could ever write something like this... Congratulations on a well writen piece of work.
- 27/01/2005
- 15:12:23
- Score: 0 out of 6 people found this comment useful.
You strayed from your topic in several places. The flow is nonexistant and the whole idea of what your trying to say is very jumbled. You have a good point, and a good idea on an important topic. You just need to develop your paper more.
- 27/01/2005
- 14:57:56
- Score: 2 out of 6 people found this comment useful.
Great report. i have a copy of this book and read it, well sections of it, regularly. Environmantalism IS a big deal, but sometimes things just get out of hand.
- 15/01/2005
- 15:10:27
- Score: 0 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
Why is everyone on this site suck up to the higher ranking users?
- 13/01/2005
- 14:32:01
- Score: 19 out of 65 people found this comment useful.
I completely agree.
- 11/01/2005
- 15:39:54
- Score: 3 out of 7 people found this comment useful.
Isn't your closing statement kinda risky?
- 10/01/2005
- 16:17:33
- Score: 1 out of 5 people found this comment useful.
Useful, but do you happen to have anything on antithesis in this play? If you do, I'll make a deal with you before the 27th for a copy of it.
- 10/01/2005
- 16:15:25
- Score: 0 out of 5 people found this comment useful.
Why is everyone on this site suck up to the higher ranking users?
- 10/01/2005
- 16:04:30
- Score: 17 out of 57 people found this comment useful.
teachers like that stuff, get an even better grade
- 27/12/2004
- 11:01:02
- Score: 3 out of 8 people found this comment useful.
Shakespeare is one of history's best play writes and you did a really nice job analyzing his rhetoric. (HINT:You could try saying a little more on the linguistics of it next time ;)overall wonderful
- 27/12/2004
- 10:59:21
- Score: 2 out of 8 people found this comment useful.
Sometimes every little bit can help.
- 15/12/2004
- 16:20:22
- Score: 3 out of 6 people found this comment useful.
Essay acurately portrays the spooky and erie points in the book. reality doesn't exist in the book though the book can be disturbing in comparison to our reality
- 15/12/2004
- 16:05:16
- Score: 2 out of 6 people found this comment useful.
Very good job. Lots of details left out though. I never liked chemistry...
- 15/12/2004
- 15:58:52
- Score: 1 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
"shit" is really not a good word to use in an essay. There is a thesaurus on this site you know. "Shit" actually hassome interesting synonyms.
- 15/12/2004
- 15:48:05
- Score: 2 out of 8 people found this comment useful.
Kinda short and broad topics, but a good summary/general overview of the topic.
- 15/12/2004
- 15:43:09
- Score: 0 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
You ever had to prepare for an in depth class discusion on a topic like this in one night? these sorts of things can be very useful.
- 13/12/2004
- 16:38:44
- Score: 1 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
Try rereading your essay, it's a little misworded in places but other than that you did a good job. :-)
- 01/12/2004
- 14:58:50
- Score: 3 out of 7 people found this comment useful.
Too many medical terms with more than 7 syllables. You could maybe include somewhere the meaning of these words? footnotes,ect...?
- 26/11/2004
- 11:49:44
- Score: 4 out of 10 people found this comment useful.
You analized the fact well, but couldn't you have been a little more specific about what the actual text of the terms were? I've never actually read a copy of the document myself, only what other people have written and documentaries, your points would be clearer if you included the basis from which they come.
- 26/11/2004
- 11:21:51
- Score: 2 out of 6 people found this comment useful.
This is really cool, I've never read anything quite like this before. this is neat, and well written. :-)
- 26/11/2004
- 11:10:15
- Score: 3 out of 7 people found this comment useful.
I like this, very inteting, lots of good info!
- 22/11/2004
- 05:50:17
- Score: 1 out of 5 people found this comment useful.
Wow
- 22/11/2004
- 05:47:22
- Score: 0 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
You need at least 2 more citations for a paper like this. You did a really good job on this though :-)
- 22/11/2004
- 05:44:56
- Score: 1 out of 6 people found this comment useful.
I ussualy try to follow the latest newa on endangered species, but i hadn't heard of this yet. Your paper is really repetitve and wordy, try working on that and your grades will getv even better.
- 20/11/2004
- 18:51:34
- Score: 3 out of 7 people found this comment useful.
I like this and most of Orwell's other stories/novels. You did a very nice job with this one. :)
- 11/11/2004
- 17:07:11
- Score: 4 out of 9 people found this comment useful.
Essays are supposed to have a little bit of attitude worked in. This is very precise and to the point. Good job.
- 11/11/2004
- 16:59:50
- Score: 8 out of 18 people found this comment useful.
If someone doesn't already have a clue about your topic they're not gonna get any of this, but it is very well written and is a commendable piece of work.
- 04/11/2004
- 18:16:07
- Score: 1 out of 6 people found this comment useful.
Being as I have some N.A. heritage (Comanche) I can appreciate what is being said here. But, don't you think you could have narrowed down the topic a lttle more? that is a very large point you're addressing.Don't get me wrong, you did a really good job,but try being a liite more specific.
- 04/11/2004
- 18:12:12
- Score: 5 out of 10 people found this comment useful.
I have had to read this book before. Anyone who has the patence to analyze the context in this much detail is amazing.
- 04/11/2004
- 18:05:16
- Score: 2 out of 7 people found this comment useful.
I really like this particular essay becayse the author mostly refrained from making judgemental comments about the teenagers. I have known people who have been through the exact situation described above, she's in the suicide statistics.
- 31/10/2004
- 09:22:07
- Score: 2 out of 7 people found this comment useful.
Whatch your language and give more sensory details
- 28/10/2004
- 17:46:21
- Score: 2 out of 11 people found this comment useful.
I don't know whether to call this brilliant or demented. I did notice a few grammer mistakes though. Try proofreading a little more or get someone else to. Lots of little words are gone.
- 28/10/2004
- 17:41:53
- Score: 2 out of 11 people found this comment useful.
Overall= greatBUT= a little to mush repitition in the beggining you think? Its like one of those "in the beggining, when we began..." type of things
- 28/10/2004
- 17:31:12
- Score: 34 out of 68 people found this comment useful.
MORE ANALYISIS INTSEAD OF SUMMARY! WAY BELOW EXPECTAIONS IN COMPARISON TO YOUR OTHER WORKS
- 28/10/2004
- 17:27:04
- Score: 14 out of 43 people found this comment useful.
YOu have a lot of good points, but you need more examples and annalysis. Nice vocabulary though.
- 27/10/2004
- 14:57:00
- Score: 2 out of 11 people found this comment useful.
Very well written. really good poem too. one of my favorites, like Poe better though
- 25/10/2004
- 15:12:45
- Score: 20 out of 30 people found this comment useful.
This is one of the best essays I've read on this subject in a long time. You have a works cited/bibliography for it? You should of had a higher grade... what'd you get docked for?
- 25/10/2004
- 14:59:40
- Score: 2 out of 11 people found this comment useful.
I think your essay really needs a better title
- 11/09/2004
- 17:03:00
- Score: 2 out of 12 people found this comment useful.
YOu hit all the right high points with this one, good job. The only thing I really would do to change it would be to compare & contrast a little, maybe add a couple of allusions to other Shakespeareanworks.
- 07/09/2004
- 20:51:31
- Score: 3 out of 12 people found this comment useful.
Try using a little more allusion and not-so-blunt vocab. Also, for a paper on this topic and of this size should have at least 4 more refrences
- 07/09/2004
- 20:46:43
- Score: 3 out of 12 people found this comment useful.
Proofread your stuff *before* posting it on the web. YOur ideas are really choppy and everything is unorganized. You have a really good focus but you did a really crappy job developing it.
- 30/08/2004
- 15:26:21
- Score: 4 out of 14 people found this comment useful.