I just watched this film for English and it looks spot on!Only bad points are some spelling errors and that every apostrophe is some random characters. :PTop stuff!
- 26/02/2008
- 00:27:37
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
Nice work, but the second point is a bit confusing and doesn't flow that well.
- 25/02/2008
- 01:15:45
- Score: 3 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
I'm in year 11 as well and this looks like what id write for my prac lab report.
- 25/02/2008
- 01:10:42
- Score: 0 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
It doesn't look that complete. More needs to be added before the last sentence.
- 12/02/2008
- 21:40:05
- Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
I really liked it. Got me hooked :P I reckon its a great intro for a story. Make a sequel/comeback of suicide king
- 12/02/2008
- 21:33:45
- Score: 0 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
Really flows from paragraph to paragraph. It doesn't linger on any topic for too long. Clear and concise.
- 12/02/2008
- 21:18:47
- Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
This looks like you needed to write 300 words in 15 mins and you used lots of "cramming" techniques like over-using sources.You stated the obvious, and didn't show many reasons. I don't think you needed to define the basics.
- 12/02/2008
- 01:02:51
- Score: 17 out of 17 people found this comment useful.
This was pretty interesting. It was nicely set out with appropriate headings and subheadings. There was definitely enough facts (against the CTists)!
- 12/02/2008
- 00:55:34
- Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.