This is a very readable and detailed literature review of a complex subject. There are sufficient scientific/medical explanations to give it substance and enough anecdotes to keep it relevent. References are cited by general source which may not fit some agendas, but I found it clearer in this format. Grammar, punctuation, spelling and organization are very good.
- 05/12/2003
- 01:22:14
- Score: 8 out of 8 people found this comment useful.
The paper reviewed the milestones of Piaget's life with comments as to the relevence of various items, which kept it from being a "dry" recitation of facts. Also it accurately described Piagetian principles. This essay has very good references and quotes, good content and organization.However, it does need some serious editing. There are quite a few probable "typos" - for example, "to" for "two," and "our think" for "our thinking,"to cite a few such items. I found at least 10 punctuation errors such as commas missing or misused. The tense is not consistent throughout and in the 3rd paragraph, the tense changes mid-paragraph. There was one sentence fragment improperly attached to another sentence. A couple of sentences were just awkward because of an unclear subject or because of language,e.g.(4th Para) "he was many positions. . ." (easily fixed by switching "held" for "was").
- 05/12/2003
- 01:04:48
- Score: 6 out of 6 people found this comment useful.
This biography supplies no eye opening details, but does cover all the salient facts in an organized, gramatically correct, readable fashion.
- 03/12/2003
- 16:42:50
- Score: 3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
This is a brief personal essay written in the first person as if the author were a 64 year-old schizophrenic patient. It is worthwhile and compelling for its believability, content and accuracy. Having family members who work in the health care field, this fits with not only what I've heard, but with the type of revolving door situation these patients get into. Fair to Good rendition of colloquial language.
- 03/12/2003
- 16:32:24
- Score: 6 out of 6 people found this comment useful.
This paper presents a collection of the facts of G.R.Clark's life, so it is useful in that regard. There are many grammar and syntax errors. Organization is unapparenent, since it is not chronological and is not arranged by family, education, achievements etc. It seems to need a thorough editing, but is useful as data and for references.
- 03/12/2003
- 16:22:20
- Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.