You've cited, as most pro-marijuana people do, facts that have little to do with the conclusions you've drawn. For instance: 700k cases of possession does not mean 700k cases of marijuana possession.
- 05/05/2003
- 21:19:50
- Score: 4 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
Though you introduce some intresting points...social-security and the Harvard study...others utilize false logic or are taken out of context...such as the ecological footprint...decent inflammatory writing though.
- 05/05/2003
- 11:50:40
- Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
You cite many "decent" though potentially biased facts...your problem lies in connecting your facts to your argument clearly...they are used mainly to cite the history of gun control.
- 04/05/2003
- 22:25:46
- Score: 0 out of 2 people found this comment useful.