An Analysis of Technical Writing

In the Journal of Forestry article, "Fuel Treatments at the Wildland-Urban Interface: Common Concerns in Diverse Regions" by Gregory Winters, Christine Vogt, and Jeremy S. Fried, variables associated with public acceptance and beliefs about forest fuel management strategies are examined. The use of six open-ended questions, where the questions are moderated and the answers tape recorded by Winters (2000), is effective. These six questions, asked to randomly chosen public participants from the wildland-urban interface, provoke responses that lean toward the participants' true beliefs and attitudes about the approaches and outcomes of fuel treatments. They also allowed the authors' to gage the intention of the participants involved in the focus group interviews to either oppose or support fuel treatments. This data can be very useful to the authors, who are trying to reach those tasked with implementing fuel treatments within the wildland-urban interface.

The value of this article to the target audience is the understanding of public perception and acceptance of fuel management strategies like prescribed fire, mechanical treatments, and defensible space requirements around structures within the wildland-urban interface.

Denver, CO, May 21, 2004 -- Homeland Security Unde...

English: Denver, CO, May 21, 2004 -- Homeland Secu...

Winter cycling gear

The authors primary concern for writing this article is to support the claim that"[f]orest fuel reduction has the best chance of success if managers understand the factors that influence public acceptance of fuel management (Winter, Vogt, & Fried, 2002)."Their issue and purpose for writing the article is clearly defined in the abstract:This article reports an analysis of focus group interviews with wildland-urban interface residents at sites selected to provide variation in fire regimes, fire history, land use and ownership patterns, and socioeconomic profiles. Analyzed within the framework developed from the human dimensions and social psychology literature, the focus group data reveals four common factors that affect the acceptance of three fuel management strategies (prescribed fire, mechanical treatments, indefensible space requirements): beliefs...