Animals have been used in medical research for centuries. In a recent count, it was determined that 8815 animals were being used for research at MSU, 8503 of them were rats, mice, hamsters, and gerbils. The strugle against animal research has been one of the most debatable issues of the decade. Even though most researchers need to do experiments on animals in order to achieve medical advances, animal research should not be allowed because it is cruel and inhumane, it is not always accurate, and often unnecessary.
The first reason why animal research should not be allowed is that testing on animals is cruel and inhumane. According Clifford Sean in his book, "Animal Research", animal right activists have gathered much information that has closed down laboratories that violate anti-cruelty statutes. This includes a 1984 video tape stolen from the University of Pensilvania Head Injury clinic. The video tape involves anesthetized baboons receiving blows to the head to break their necks and cause brain damage.
In the same book Alex Pacheco tells about the conditions he witnessed in a monkey laboratory, and expresses how horrified he was by the painful experiments these monkeys have to go through. In this laboratories young chimpanzees are infected with deseases, put into tiny cages, and left ther for several years. This inhumane treatment should be used on brakers of the law instead of these inocent, unprotected animals. Animal research it's cruel and inhumane, but it's also sometimes inaccurate.
The second reason why animal research should not be allowed is because it's not always accurate. According to Bernard Rollen in his book, "Animal Abuse and Human Morality", scientists in the 1960's concluded from many animal experiments that the inhaled tobacco smoke did not cause lung cancer. We all know that this is totally not...
A question?
Could you please tell me where you get your evidence that England dont use healthy animals in their medical research? I know for a fact that certain places in England certainly does use healthy animals. A place called 'Huntingdon Life sciences' being one of those places. It has been on the news and I would have thought it would have been a readily available source of information for your essay, I live in England and can find you many Newspaper reports on this place. I am sorry to dispute your statement but it is just not true. Also I find it hard to believe that you received 100% for this piece of writing as your information is inaccurate and some of the language is far to emotive to be a level headed argument against animal research. Also occasionally your spelling is incorrect and your grammar slips from time to time. I am not nit- picking just pointing out why I believe your assignment is not worthy of a grade of 100%.
6 out of 6 people found this comment useful.