An Application of Hegel's Dialectic on the Development of the Critics' Beliefs
In order to understand our modern literature, there has to be a complete comprehension of the earlier writings and their authors, since understanding the founders of literature will help in achieving a better realization of the way of constructing and then of predicting the development of literature and criticism. This development is discussed in this paper depending on the dialectic theory which was contributed by Hegel; and then it will be applied on a group of critics to understand how their beliefs were developed. The critics are Plato, Aristotle, Sidney, Dryden, and Behn.
The dialectic theory is established by Hegel. This philosophical theory is based on the historical development of the main beliefs of a certain society at a certain time. These beliefs undergo changes according to the society in which they exist, resulting in having new and different ideas.
The old and the new ideas usually don't get along so there will be a struggle to have the dominance over that society, as a result of this conflict mixture will be produced of developed ideas.
The main purpose of the dialectic theory is to have a link between the constructive categories of experience. This link works as a guide to contribute one category to another, in a way that when the first category is used and the second is neglected this will lead to contradiction, so every group is in connection with the other until that connection finally leads to a stable and independent category (Mctaggart 1).
When the result of predicating two opposite categories refers to the same single category at the same time this will violate the law of contradiction; but this reached predicated category is a place where they are combined so they get...
WHAT IS REAL IS RATIONAL!
In deed,Hegel must have really thought well before outlining this dialectics.i am of the opinion that his synthesis and antithesis are all borne out of the fact that he lived large in the world of his time.
These idea of what is real is rational negates a whole lot of this.Reason is very important to Hegel.He did not think it is worthy to attune such theory to the suffering masses of his time,what is real is ratinal.oppression and subjugation of the poor is real of course it is rational.
Any way,i always do admire Karl Marx for having a turning point in his life to the understanding that marterial wel being determines existence and not consciousness or reason as the case may be.But then,in many ways i find this write up intereting,very philosopical but art incline.cool.keep it up!
3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.