Traditional drama, like in "Oedipus the King" by Sophocles, reflects a world view composed of a rational, well-ordered universe, a comforting system of beliefs (faith in something, someone), a stable scale of values, an ethical system in working condition. (Johnson, 2006). Beckett, in "Waiting for Godot", has turned away from the traditional drama and has an entirely different world view. This world view is marked by chaos instead of order. The universe is void - nothing to believe in but nothingness. There is no moral ethical code. There are just people existing, being only for themselves, and sometimes by themselves. (Gordon, 2002)"Waiting for Godot", is part of the Theatre of the Absurd. This implies that it is meant to be irrational. Absurd theatre does away with the concepts of drama, chronological plot, logical language, themes, and recognizable settings. There is also a split between the intellect and the body within the work.
English: Caricature of Samuel Beckett, Nobel Prize...
Mehdi Bajestani, as Lucky, (from a production by N...
Waiting for Godot, directed by Macedonian theatre ...Thus Vladimir represents the intellect and Estragon the body, both of whom cannot exist without the other. (GradeSaver, 1999)When comparing the structure of "Waiting for Godot" with the structure of a traditional play, like "Oedipus the King", the following can be noted:"Oedipus the King" is a story with a clearly defined beginning, middle and end. It has linear progression. There is firstly an exposition, followed by rising action, climax, falling action and lastly resolution. In the beginning, Thebes is suffering and Oedipus is trying to save it. In the middle, he searches diligently for the truth that will save it and at the end, he discovers the truth, and Thebes is saved. (GradeSaver, 1999). In "Waiting for Godot", the story seems meaningless or absurd. The progression is circular rather than linear. The two characters, Estragon and Vladimir, arrive to stand around waiting for Godot. They keep waiting, although...