� PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT �1�
Comparing ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline Version 3.0 against the 9 areas of the Australian Standard
The fundamental difference between them is ICB has taxonomy by listing the knowledge and experience required at each level and provides a subjective analysis for personal attitudes and general impressions. On the other hand, AIPM emphasis on the expected competency of Project manager in different level in each one of the 9 areas but it does not cover as skills personal attitude and general impression aspects (Seabury 2004). The next table illustrates the differences between them.
The table shows the comparison between the two standards
IPMA Level C | Comparison | IPMA ICB Included in the elements | AIPM Areas (ANCSPM) | Knowledge Area |
AIPM Level4 | ||||
AIPM | Contribute to project scope & apply project scope controls | 1.01, 1.03 , 1.06, 1.08, 1.09, 1.16, 1.19, 1.20, 2.08, 3.01, 3.02, 3.03 & 3.4 | 1 - Plan and Manage Scope | Project Scope management |
ICB | Has successfully managed the scope & deliverables situations. | |||
AIPM | Contribute to develop the project schedules & apply project schedule management skills, assess time management outcome. | 1.10 ,1.12 & 3.07 | 2 - Plan and Manage Time | Project Time management |
ICB | Has successfully managed the project phases & the time schedule situations. | |||
AIPM | Contribute to develop the project budget & finalize the cost, control of the project cost. | 1.11 | 3 - Plan and Manage Cost | Project Cost management |
ICB | Has successfully managed the cost & financial resource with taking claims in consideration. | |||
AIPM | Contribute to plan quality & implement quality assurance improvement | 1.13, 2.09 & 3.1 | 4 - Plan and Manage Quality | Project Quality management |
ICB | Defined as efficiency: has practiced efficiency effectively in non-complex project situations | |||
AIPM | Be involved in teamwork &be charged with the development and training of the staff. | 1.05 | 5 - Plan and Manage Human Resources | Project Human Resource management |
ICB | Defined as personnel management: has participated in personnel development & business issues in project situations | |||
AIPM | Contribute to plan the communication, manage the information, manage the activities of information & assess the communication outcomes. | 1.07 , 2.01, 2.02, 2.03, 2.04, 2.05, 2.06, 2.07, 2.10, 2.11, 2.12, 2.13, 2.14, 2.15 & 3.08 | 6 - Plan and Manage Communication | Project Communication management |
ICB | Has successfully managed the communication situations with emphasis on diplomacy i.e. verbal, written & body language. | |||
AIPM | Contribute to identify the risky event, control the risk & evaluate the risky management outcomes. | 1.18, 1.02, 1.17, 2.10, 2.15, 3.05, 3.06, 3.09 & 3.11 | 7 - Plan and Manage Risk | Risk Project management |
ICB | Slightly separates risk & uncertainty: has successfully managed the risk and opportunity situations. | |||
AIPM | Contribute to plan procurement, select the contractor, procurement & finalization of activities. | 1.04 & 1.15 | 8 - Plan and Manage Procurement | Project Procurement management |
ICB | Combines the Procurement with the contract as they are relevant to a successful manager who has successfully managed the procurement and contract situations. | |||
AIPM | The function is not a competency at level 4 it is expected of levels 5 and 6 only | 1.01, 3.04 & 3.07 | 9 - Plan and Manage Project Integrative Processes | Project Integration management |
ICB | Defines it as clarity and vision represented by contextual, behavioral &technical competencies which is crucial for project management success |
Self Assessment Using the Standards Guides or Experience Scale
Out of 10 | Out of 10 | Out of 10 | |||||||||
1 Technical competence | Elem. | Knowledge | Experience | 2 Behavioral competence | Elem. | Knowledge | Experience | 3 Contextual competence | Elem. | Knowledge | Experience |
1.01 | 6 | 5 | 2.01 | 4 | 4 | 3.01 | 5 | 5 | |||
1.02 | 5 | 5 | 2.02 | 5 | 5 | 3.02 | 3 | 3 | |||
1.03 | 5 | 4 | 2.03 | 5 | 4 | 3.03 | 4 | 3 | |||
1.04 | 5 | 4 | 2.04 | 5 | 4 | 3.04 | 5 | 3 | |||
1.05 | 4 | 4 | 2.05 | 6 | 4 | 3.05 | 5 | 4 | |||
1.06 | 6 | 4 | 2.06 | 5 | 5 | 3.06 | 5 | 4 | |||
1.07 | 6 | 6 | 2.07 | 4 | 4 | 3.07 | 4 | 3 | |||
1.08 | 5 | 4 | 2.08 | 5 | 4 | 3.08 | 4 | 3 | |||
1.09 | 5 | 4 | 2.09 | 5 | 4 | 3.09 | 4 | 4 | |||
1.10 | 6 | 4 | 2.10 | 5 | 4 | 3.10 | 4 | 3 | |||
1.11 | 6 | 6 | 2.11 | 5 | 4 | 3.11 | 3 | 3 | |||
1.12 | 5 | 4 | 2.12 | 5 | 4 | - | |||||
1.13 | 5 | 4 | 2.13 | 5 | 4 | - | |||||
1.14 | 4 | 4 | 2.14 | 4 | 4 | - | |||||
1.15 | 5 | 4 | 2.15 | 5 | 4 | - | |||||
1.16 | 6 | 4 | - | - | |||||||
1.17 | 5 | 4 | - | - | |||||||
1.18 | 6 | 5 | - | - | |||||||
1.19 | 6 | 5 | - | - | |||||||
1.20 | 6 | 5 | - | - | |||||||
Avg. | 5.4 | 4.5 | Avg. | 4.9 | 4.1 | Avg. | 4.2 | 3.5 |
(Appendix 3 Self-assessment sheet, ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline Version 3.0)
�
Competency assessment using AIPM and shows the skills gap in the same table
�
Reference
Seabury, C (International Project Management Association), Comparison between ICB and other Project Management Standards, 2004, retrieved on August 16, 2010, from <http://www.aeipro.com/index.php/component/remository/func-startdown/29/>.
Bibliography
Australian Institute of Project Management (AIPM) (2002) Registered Project Manager, retrieved on August 16, 2010, from http://www.aipm.com.au/html/regpm.cfm.
Australian Institute of Project Management (2002) National Competency Standards for Project Management, retrieved on August 16, 2010, from http://www.aipm.com.au/html/ncspm.cfm.