Comparing ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline Version 3.0 against the 9 areas of the Australian Standard

Essay by Mehmood August 2010

download word file, 3 pages 0.0

� PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT �1�

Comparing ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline Version 3.0 against the 9 areas of the Australian Standard

The fundamental difference between them is ICB has taxonomy by listing the knowledge and experience required at each level and provides a subjective analysis for personal attitudes and general impressions. On the other hand, AIPM emphasis on the expected competency of Project manager in different level in each one of the 9 areas but it does not cover as skills personal attitude and general impression aspects (Seabury 2004). The next table illustrates the differences between them.

The table shows the comparison between the two standards

IPMA

Level C

Comparison

IPMA

ICB

Included in the elements

AIPM Areas

(ANCSPM)

Knowledge Area

AIPM

Level4

AIPM

Contribute to project scope & apply project scope controls

1.01, 1.03 , 1.06, 1.08, 1.09, 1.16, 1.19, 1.20, 2.08, 3.01, 3.02, 3.03 & 3.4

1 - Plan and Manage Scope

Project Scope management

ICB

Has successfully managed the scope & deliverables situations.

AIPM

Contribute to develop the project schedules & apply project schedule management skills, assess time management outcome.

1.10 ,1.12 & 3.07

2 - Plan and Manage Time

Project Time

management

ICB

Has successfully managed the project phases & the time schedule situations.

AIPM

Contribute to develop the project budget & finalize the cost, control of the project cost.

1.11

3 - Plan and Manage Cost

Project Cost

management

ICB

Has successfully managed the cost & financial resource with taking claims in consideration.

AIPM

Contribute to plan quality & implement quality assurance improvement

1.13, 2.09 & 3.1

4 - Plan and Manage Quality

Project Quality management

ICB

Defined as efficiency: has practiced efficiency effectively in non-complex project situations

AIPM

Be involved in teamwork &be charged with the development and training of the staff.

1.05

5 - Plan and Manage Human Resources

Project Human Resource management

ICB

Defined as personnel management: has participated in personnel development & business issues in project situations

AIPM

Contribute to plan the communication, manage the information, manage the activities of information & assess the communication outcomes.

1.07 , 2.01, 2.02, 2.03, 2.04, 2.05, 2.06, 2.07, 2.10, 2.11, 2.12, 2.13, 2.14, 2.15 & 3.08

6 - Plan and Manage Communication

Project Communication management

ICB

Has successfully managed the communication situations with emphasis on diplomacy i.e. verbal, written & body language.

AIPM

Contribute to identify the risky event, control the risk & evaluate the risky management outcomes.

1.18, 1.02, 1.17, 2.10, 2.15, 3.05, 3.06, 3.09 & 3.11

7 - Plan and Manage Risk

Risk Project management

ICB

Slightly separates risk & uncertainty: has successfully managed the risk and opportunity situations.

AIPM

Contribute to plan procurement, select the contractor, procurement & finalization of activities.

1.04 & 1.15

8 - Plan and Manage Procurement

Project Procurement management

ICB

Combines the Procurement with the contract as they are relevant to a successful manager who has successfully managed the procurement and contract situations.

AIPM

The function is not a competency at level 4 it is expected of levels 5 and 6 only

1.01, 3.04 & 3.07

9 - Plan and Manage Project Integrative Processes

Project Integration management

ICB

Defines it as clarity and vision represented by contextual, behavioral &technical competencies which is crucial for project management success

Self Assessment Using the Standards Guides or Experience Scale

Out of 10

Out of 10

Out of 10

1 Technical competence

Elem.

Knowledge

Experience

2 Behavioral competence

Elem.

Knowledge

Experience

3 Contextual competence

Elem.

Knowledge

Experience

1.01

6

5

2.01

4

4

3.01

5

5

1.02

5

5

2.02

5

5

3.02

3

3

1.03

5

4

2.03

5

4

3.03

4

3

1.04

5

4

2.04

5

4

3.04

5

3

1.05

4

4

2.05

6

4

3.05

5

4

1.06

6

4

2.06

5

5

3.06

5

4

1.07

6

6

2.07

4

4

3.07

4

3

1.08

5

4

2.08

5

4

3.08

4

3

1.09

5

4

2.09

5

4

3.09

4

4

1.10

6

4

2.10

5

4

3.10

4

3

1.11

6

6

2.11

5

4

3.11

3

3

1.12

5

4

2.12

5

4

-

1.13

5

4

2.13

5

4

-

1.14

4

4

2.14

4

4

-

1.15

5

4

2.15

5

4

-

1.16

6

4

-

-

1.17

5

4

-

-

1.18

6

5

-

-

1.19

6

5

-

-

1.20

6

5

-

-

Avg.

5.4

4.5

Avg.

4.9

4.1

Avg.

4.2

3.5

(Appendix 3 Self-assessment sheet, ICB - IPMA Competence Baseline Version 3.0)

�

Competency assessment using AIPM and shows the skills gap in the same table

�

Reference

Seabury, C (International Project Management Association), Comparison between ICB and other Project Management Standards, 2004, retrieved on August 16, 2010, from <http://www.aeipro.com/index.php/component/remository/func-startdown/29/>.

Bibliography

Australian Institute of Project Management (AIPM) (2002) Registered Project Manager, retrieved on August 16, 2010, from http://www.aipm.com.au/html/regpm.cfm.

Australian Institute of Project Management (2002) National Competency Standards for Project Management, retrieved on August 16, 2010, from http://www.aipm.com.au/html/ncspm.cfm.