"Ethics Affect Actions"
"What is the appropriate action?" It's a controversial question that is a focal point for moral and ethical code. Morals and ethics is, of course, a subject that runs deep in the discussion of philosophy. People are faced with moral dilemmas everyday, which often times they decide without thoroughly examining their options. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are two philosophers who focus on the topic of ethics, yet with two different outlooks. Kant is considered a non-consequentialist, which means he feels the intentions, motives, and good will are more important than the results or consequences of an action. On the other hand, Mill is considered a consequentialist, which means he feels happiness is the ultimate end of humanity. It seems that Kant and Mill would stand opposed on many ethical topics, like the question of meeting with Professor Wagstaff. A student has made a promise to meet with Prof.
Wagstaff to discuss philosophy, but the student's friend suddenly falls ill and begs to be taken to the hospital. With urgency of the situation growing, the student then asks himself what he should do. He might ask himself what Kant and Mill feel is the appropriate action, but before he can do that we must fully understand their thoughts on ethics.
The backbone of Kant's philosophy is the belief in the fundamental freedom of the individual. Kant did not indicate anarchy, but rather the idea of self-government and the creation and obedience of universal laws. He believed the moral value of an action is assessed not from the purpose of the action, but from the "maxim" from which the action springs. He defines a maxim as a personal policy in the cause-effect framework. Kant said that a person should only act on these maxims that could...
Ethics Affect Actions
This is a well-written piece. You did a good job at introducing the subject, although you could've elaborated a bit on the hypothetical in the introduction, for it is the framework for the essay. Both sides are explained well, but I do agree that Kant could've been explained at more length. The conclusion could use a bit of work, but overall you successfully got your point across. Well done.
4 out of 4 people found this comment useful.