Compare Brutus and Cassius in terms of their natures, attitudes, and intentions. Draw examples and quotations from the text to support your argument.In ShakespeareÃÂs ÃÂJulius CaesarÃÂ, no two characters differ as greatly as do Cassius and Brutus. BrutusÃÂs rigid idealism and his inability to understand the true nature of men is a stark against CassiusÃÂs deviousness and keen sense of perception. While BrutusÃÂs determination to liberate Rome forces him to act against his love for Caesar, CassiusÃÂs sense of republicanism is only second to his personal animosity for Caesar.
CassiusÃÂs most significant trait is his ability to see ÃÂquite through the deeds of menÃÂ; Brutus, on the other hand, sometimes borders on the naïve and is almost unable to understand the true nature of people. He simply cannot understand that men like Cassius are inherently self-seeking by nature. When discussing Casca, Brutus dismisses him as a ÃÂblunt fellowàwhile the more perceptive Cassius insists that Casca merely ÃÂputs on this tardy formàto conceal his true intelligence.
This is perhaps due to their very different natures; Brutus is ruled by logical thought ÃÂ which can be seen by his painstaking appraisal of the situation (ÃÂHe would be crowned. / How that might change his nature, thereÃÂs the / questionÃÂ) before making his decision to join the conspirators ÃÂ and Cassius, by instinct. BrutusÃÂs idealism causes him to make many miscalculations that prove to be politically fatal. When Cassius asserts that Mark Antony will prove to be ÃÂa shrewd contriverÃÂ, Brutus argues against his murder, telling him ÃÂ with typical naivety ÃÂ that ÃÂhe [Mark Antony] can do no more than CaesarÃÂs arm/ When CaesarÃÂs head is off.ÃÂ But Cassius understands that the ÃÂingrafted love he [Mark Antony] bears to CaesarÃÂ will ultimately make...