Logical Fallacies in Today’s Politics

Essay by EssaySwap ContributorUniversity, Bachelor's February 2008

download word file, 4 pages 0.0

Downloaded 19 times

A logical fallacy is an argument that contains a mistake in reasoning (Bassham, Wallace, Wallace, Irwin, & Nardone, 2002, p. 140). In the world of politics, logical fallacies are in abundance. While politicians say they are truthful and honest, many times they tend to get caught up in fallacies to either cover their misspoken statements or twist the truth to their favor. Also, people and groups that oppose certain politicians also tend to get caught up in fallacies. In most recent news, the opposition to Colorado Senatorial candidate Pete Coors is guilty of the fallacy attacking the motive, opposition to Presidential Candidate John Kerry is guilty of slippery slope, and President Bush is guilty of hasty generalization.

Attacking the motive is the logical fallacy that is committed when arguments criticize a person's motivation for offering a particular argument or claim, rather than examining the worth of the argument or claim itself (Bassham et al.,

2002, p. 144). In critical thinking and decision making, people often let their emotions get involved in their thinking process. Attacking a person's motive rather than the argument itself, is typically a byproduct of emotions. Specifically in the decision making process, attacking the motive can severely affect the final outcome of a decision if it is used in any step of the process. In Colorado, Pete Coors, owner of Coors Brewing Company, is running for United States Senate. One of his political arguments is that he would like to change the legal drinking age from twenty one to eighteen. Opponents to Coors say that he only wants to lower the age so his company can sell more alcohol. They are attacking his motive rather than his argument. Coors argues that by lowering the drinking age, young people will learn responsible drinking at an earlier age...