I did not find the ending of "Frankenstein" satisfying because there was no âÂÂconfrontation between the monster and his creator, we didn't know what is going âÂÂto happen with the monster, and Victor just died... After reading a book that is âÂÂfilled with action and shocking events and many deaths and murders you expect a âÂÂshocking and exciting ending that will astonish and satisfy the reader but I didn't âÂÂfind this ending in "Frankenstein". âÂÂ
At the end the reader was expecting many things to be explained or to come âÂÂto an end in a way or another. One of the things that really surprised me and that I âÂÂdidn't understand was why Victor gave a speech to all the sailors to keep on going âÂÂwith their journey when he told Robert his story in the first place to drive him âÂÂaway from his obsession. Another feature that I found needed more explanation is âÂÂwhy the monster didn't kill Victor from the beginning but killed all his family and âÂÂwhy he felt guilty after all the revenge and evil he was feeling when he killed all âÂÂthose people.
Also Mary Shelly didn't inform her readers if Robert Walton âÂÂlearned from Victor's mistake or if he was affected by it. All we know is that he âÂÂleft the decision up to his crew. Robert also didn't comment a lot on Victor's story âÂÂor gave the readers much feedback not even in his letters to his sister Margaret. I âÂÂthink Shelly left her readers up in the air at the ending of the novel, it is very âÂÂunsatisfying.âÂÂ
If I was Mary Shelly and I needed to create an ending for the novel I would âÂÂdefinitely have a confrontation between Victor and the monster. It will start as a âÂÂverbal...
Collection of misinformation
this isn't an essay, it's a combination of sentances with out a topic to discuss.
2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.