Creation of the world by God is described in the book of Genesis, which is
the first book of the bible. In chapter one it says "In the beginning God created the
heavens and the earth." It gives the specific day in which God created things, and
what he created on each day. For example Genesis 1:3 says "And God said let
there be light: and there was light." and in verse 7 it says..... " And God made the
firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the
waters which were above the firmament: and it was so." another example is verse
21 .... "And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth,
which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kin, and every winged fowl
after his kind: God saw that it was good." These are just a few examples given in
the bible I could give many more.
Gods and sodas
Charles Darwin, photographed by Julia Margaret Cam...
The Creation of AdamCreation has always been there because it is
true unlike Darwinism, also known as evolution. (Gradually developed form of life
starting simply as a cell- false belief." Evolution is a man-made theory, created by
a bunch of people who call themselves scientist who were very lost. Creation on
the other hand is a God-made thing, created by no one except God. Some people
do not believe in God and in Psalm 14:1 we are told... " The fool hath said in his
heart there is no God." People often say "If God created the universe then who
created God? Or you might hear from someone more intelligent, "If the universe
needs a cause then why doesn't God?" Well, everything that has a beginning
has a cause, and God had no beginning, so he doesn't need a cause. God also
being the creator had to of created time, so having created time, he is outside of
it. So He has no beginning in time, has always existed having no beginning or
end, so He doesn't need a cause which gives us the answer to the question.
According to the Oxford dictionary, Science is defined as... "A branch of
study which is concerned either with a connected body of demonstrated truths or
with observed facts systematically classified and more or less colligated by being
brought under general laws, and which includes trustworthy methods for the the
discovery of new truth within its domain." or in my own words science is.... based
on truth, and is the studying of theories and the searching of evidence to prove
those theories right or wrong. So if evolution were true, it could be supported by
events in history or proven by transitional forms in the alleged time periods. But
when it comes to evolution there is no evidence, yet people who call themselves
scientist state that evolution is true without any proven facts, which "truth" is the
basis for science. Therefore they cant be considered scientist because science
itself is based on truth and proven facts, and evolutionist did not base evolution
on truth or facts.
When it comes to creation views have never changed, there have been
people that have separated the church and then views have changed but creation
itself never has. Over time we have observed more facts that prove creation but
the creation process has remained the same, because creation is true. When it
comes to evolution, yes many point of views have changed. It has been said that
as Charles Darwin (author of the "origin of species") laid on his death bed and
said that he wished he never would have written his book.
Because of evolutionist, they have taken the Bible out of public schools,
and evolution has had an immeasurable effect on children in the schools. In the
public schools they teach that the earth is millions or even billions of years old,
but when they put men on the moon they expected to find feet or even yards of
dust to help prove evolution but instead they found only a few inches of dust.
Even though that has been used against evolution, they are still teaching kids
evolution as a truth not a theory. School used to be based on God and used to
pray before classes get started, and children used to carry their bibles to school.
Our schools were once God based, now they are based on unproven facts and
lies.
Scientific creationism takes something allot of people do not have and that
is "FAITH", according to Hebrews 11:1 it states that "Now faith is the substance
of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." In Genesis 2 we are given
details of the whole creation process. In Genesis 2:7 it states that Adam was
created from the dust of the ground," not from an ape. Also in Genesis 1:26 it
says: "God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness; and let them
have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over every creeping thing that creeps
on the earth." God made us, mankind, in His image- not the image or form of
animals. The Bible says also that Eve was created from one of Adam's ribs,
which would explain why women have one more rib than men. Paleontology
could be the number one thing to help prove creation. The lack of transitional
forms was Darwin's biggest problem in trying to prove evolution. Darwin had
expected an "inconceivably great" number of intermediate and transitional forms,
but they found absolutely none in all studies they did. Transitional forms are
fossils found that are in an "in between" stage of life form- like switching from ape
to human. Darwin also said that later there would be discoveries that would fill in
all of the gaps, and to this day not one discover has led to such a thing. "Some
evolutionists have tried to escape the idea of transitional forms by leaning on
punctuated equilibrium, which says that the transitional forms were cut off by
"worldwide" cataclysms that made an extinction of animals so there would be no
new radical life forms." But if this were true, then why and how did man live
through this, doesn't evolution teach that we evolved from animals? If so, then
why didn't we die off with them, another factor pointing to creation. With
absolutely no evidence to back up either one of these theories, these "so called"
scientists- who are supposed to be basing their findings on truth, look like a
bunch of fools. Some animals were quickly buried after death, and by sinking in
mud or being buried in a sand storm, over time more sediment covered the
remains. The parts of the animals that didn't rot or decay- such as the bones or
teeth, were surrounded by a newly formed sediment. Under the right
circumstances, which would be not getting eaten by an animal or not much
weathering, parts of the animal in the buried animal's bodies "underwent" a series
of changes. As the bone very slowly decayed water "infused" with minerals
seeped into the bone and replaced the chemicals in the bone with rocklike
minerals. The process of fossilization includes the dissolving and replacement of
the original minerals in the original object... the fossil. Most animals did not and
will not fossilize- they will either simply decay, or get lost or eaten, and will be
gone from the fossil record. "Fossils are forms of life which are presumed to have
existed during limited periods of geological time and have been widespread in
occurrence, thus indexing the age of rocks in which they are found." So the study
of fossils, or Paleontology, teaches us the age of the fossils- and the fossils we
have are not billions of years old. They are only at the stage of, at most, a couple
thousand years, which is another truth to help prove creation. Are dinosaurs a
testimony for creation? Yes, dinosaurs are one of the greatest fascinations to
men and also to children- and a very powerful testimony for creationism. The first
fossil of a dinosaur was found in England over150 years ago. It was a very large
tooth, which the discovery led to a discovery of more teeth and bones. At first
they thought that the teeth belonged to an ancient rhinosauras, but later
discovered that the teeth resembled that of an iguana- just must larger.
Evolutionists thought that this could be used to help prove evolution, but it
couldn't. With such a size difference between the teeth of an iguana and the
teeth found, there should have been transitional forms- and there were absolutely
none found., which was used against evolution again. People are often trying to
explain the extinction of dinosaurs, and one of the most popular theories is that
an astroid struck the earth, making a huge cloud of dust and gas that covered the
entire earth- making the earth either very cold or very hot, killing the dinosaurs.
But again, if that were true then humans would be extinct too. Humans mingled
with dinosaurs and in passages in the bible it often speaks of killing a dragon, and
the details it gives of the creatures or dragons are exactly the same as to what
we have discovered about dinosaurs, proving that man and dinosaur lived at the
same time, eliminating that theory. Some examples from the bible are Micah
1:8..... "I will make a wailing like the dragons....." and in Genesis 1:21 "And God
created the whales, and every living creature that moveth which the waters
brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind and
God saw that it was good". Psalm 74: 13-14 " (13) Thou didst divide the sea by
strength, thou brakest the heads do the dragons in the waters"> people often say
that they have seen the heads of dinosaurs in the water "(14) Thou brakeest the
head of Leviathon in pieces and gavest him to be the meat to the people
inhabiting the wilderness". which would explain the extinction of dinosaurs, as
soon as God gave the people permission to eat meat, dinosaur was a perfect
choice and so many men were hunting them and eventually they just died off.
Dinosaurs were a perfect choice because they were so big that they could supply
allot of food to the people, and there scales and things could be used as
weapons.
The second law of thermodynamics states that all processes of nature
have a tendency toward decay and disintegration, or in other word it is saying that
eventually everything falls apart or breaks down. I mean as humans grow older
our bodies slow down and become more fragil, we develop wrinkles, our bones
break easier, we do not get in better shape or look better as we get older. We
develop new diseases and get sick. The second law of thermodynamics is also
known as entropy. Entropy also proves evolution wrong because according to
evolution, earth would be getting better and more alive, and humans would be
getting more knowledgeable, yet the opposite is happening as generations go on
we get dumber and dumber, not smarter. Humans only use about five percent of
our brains, but a great and well known genius like Albert Einstein used about ten
percent of his brain. Scientist (evolutionist) claim that we are related to the apes
only because we have many similarities in looks (if they want to say that they look
like an ape then go for it better them than me) but that does not necessarily mean
we came from them or evolved. In Genesis 1:26-27 it states ..." God said, let us
make man in our image, after our likeness, and let them have domain over the
fowl of the air and over the cattle and over all the earth" (27) So God created man
in his own image, in the image of God created in him, male and female created
he them." God created each thing to look different and everything has a special
quality about them, the two words that evolutionist hate the most to hear are
"significant designer" they hate to admit that man was created by God, not
evolved from an ape.
Example given in book
Frog t = instantaneous Prince = Nursery tale
Frog t = 300 million years Prince = science