England and France both developed very different governmental systems during the sixteenth century. Great Britain created a governmental system on which there is little infringement upon the rights of the people, and there is a parliamentary government to keep the royal power in check. The French monarchy was the exact opposite. The monarchs ruled absolutely and controlled all the affairs that took place in the kingdom. Although the English and French of the sixteenth century evolved differently, their governments both generated great power and wealth.
The English parliamentary system incorporated the ideal of a society where the people have the power. This in turn was backed by a powerful ruling class of nobles and royalty. This provided an efficient bureaucratic government that mirrors the Democratic-Republic system that is currently employed in America today. Resulting from no direct taxation, in exchange for the increase in price of royal services, the majority of the population did not have to pay exorbitant amounts to coexist in an environment with powerful figureheads.
The wealth generated was then kept inside of the royalty resulting from the nobles requiring the royal services. The commoner peasant class was not constrained by the government's financial burdens. This lead to the rise in the lower classes economically, which led to better furnishings, diet, and extra capital. The extra money then was poured into the adventurous joint-stock companies which financed voyages to Africa, India, and China. This resulted in lucrative profits from the rare commodities. The government's investment in this industry also led to a large cash flow and an increase in prestige and power in its venture throughout the uncharted seas.
The Absolute Monarchy of France took the idea of prestige and power to a new level. Taxation was placed upon sales, salt trade, and households. This generated...
Conclusion
I began reading this essay and was immediately interested. Only last year was I involved in writing similar essays. In our class, we never looked at these differences.
The first three paragraphs of this essay are wonderful. The introduction paves the way for an excellent arguement. I guess I was a little bit disappointed with the lack of personal annalysis. I could be wrong, but it appears as though you simply stated the facts. The forth paragraph would be a great place to expand and include analysis to answer why these two different forms of government were both so effective. Was it because of culture? A couple sentences would be nice.
One last thing is that in the study of history I have found that the answers to most of history's most perplexing questions lie in economics. Economics are the drive for most political decisions, and it's always good to check what's going on economically during your time period.
I think that this is a wonderful idea. I've already stated all of my suggestions, so I wish you good luck in the future.
-Kat
4 out of 4 people found this comment useful.