Everything flows beautifully!
- 25/12/2008
- 02:07:13
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
Not only is it incomplete its also in the wrong category. This is a management-based theory.How can I tell, look at the numbers... 4.1, 4.2
- 20/12/2008
- 08:56:56
- Score: 0 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
-Introduction is weak.-Seems more descriptive rather than analytic-But some parts of the case seem to be well written.Overall, average.
- 19/11/2008
- 09:32:25
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
I like the structure you've used, but I believe this is a degree-like level in comparison to what I'm working on of course.
- 19/11/2008
- 09:26:00
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
I would definitely give this a College level, because:1) you have no academic proof2) flow is somewhat weak3) weak conclusionI would give this a C, definitely not an A.
- 08/11/2008
- 23:07:49
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
There aren't a lot of essays that can explain the Kantian theory so well.If you want anything that involves Kantian and Utilitarian theories. Then this is a great point to start with a case study applied.*Definitely a fav.
- 08/11/2008
- 20:20:56
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
Great paper on the uniform positioning strategies theory!**However, I do suggest that this paper should go under Marketing, or International Marketing if there is such a category.
- 02/11/2008
- 17:34:31
- Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
This is not a marketing plan, its more like a poor marketing critique of Amazon.comOne of the major flaws I've noticed is that you said that the Target Market are '25 - 45 (young adults to early-middle age)', but in Positioning you said something totally different.
- 02/11/2008
- 01:16:46
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.