The purpose of my research on the City of Toronto's Official Plan is to critique Toronto's current planning process. The scope of my critique involves the examination of various social, livability, and quality of life issues. I will critically assess the arguments for and against amalgamation into Toronto's 'megacity', investigating any biases that may exist, and observing the effects on the aforementioned issues under a centralized metropolitan planning system. My objectives involve critiquing the establishment of a strong central authority for dealing with population growth and urban sprawl, discussing any potential problems and concerns, and examining whether this governing body is on the right path towards increasing the viability of its quality of life, livability, community building, and social development strategies for urban regional planning in Toronto.
i. Arguments Against Toronto's Official Plan
The City of Toronto has a main goal of building a more livable urban region. In 1998, the regional level of government was eradicated and Metropolitan Toronto's six municipalities were amalgamated into a single 'megacity'.
I will now critique this Plan's policies and objectives by discussing a number of social and quality of life issues relating to arguments and perspectives against the political restructuring and amalgamation of Toronto. The Plan first develops a strategy for directing growth within Toronto's urban structure. It sets out policies for the management of change through "the integration of land use and transportation" (Toronto, 2002, 9). Although the increased accessibility of traveling around Toronto with an integrated regional transportation system would benefit certain residents, the provincial government proceeded with opposition from the City and local governments, along with thousands of protestors, towards any form of a centralized metropolitan planning system. The conflict over megacity "generated a sense of public outrage" (Hodge and Robinson, 2001, 136), as policies of the new agency...
URBAN REGIONAL PLANNING CRITIQUE - TORONTO OFFICIAL PLAN
References
Boudreau, Julie-Anne. (1999). "Megacity Toronto: Struggles Over Differing Aspects of
Middle-Class Politics" in International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,
Dec 99, Vol. 23 No. 4, p 71-81.
Bunce, Susannah. (2004). "The Emergence of 'Smart Growth' Intensification in Toronto:
Environment and Economy in the New Official Plan" in Local Environment. Apr 04, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p 177-192.
City of Toronto. (2002). Toronto Official Plan. Retrieved June 16, 2005 from the City of
Toronto website: http://www.city.toronto.on.ca/torontoplan/official _plan.htm
Donald, Betsy. (2002). "Spinning Toronto's Golden Age: the Marking of a 'City that
Worked'" in Environment & Planning A. Dec 02, Vol. 34 Issue 12, p 127-155.
Gertler, Meric S. (1995). "City-Regions in the Global Economy: Choices Facing
Toronto" in Urban Regions in a Global Context. Toronto, ON: Program in Planning, University of Toronto Press.
Greater Toronto. (1996). Report of the GTA Task Force, January 1996. Toronto, ON:
Queen's Printer.
Hanna, Kevin S. and Walton-Roberts, Margaret. (2004). "Quality of Place and the
Rescaling of Urban Governance: The Case of Toronto" in Journal of Canadian
Studies. Fall 04, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p 37-68.
Hodge, Gerald and Robinson, Ira I. (2001). Planning Canadian Regions. Vancouver, BC:
University of British Columbia Press.
Holden, Alfred. (1997). "Reluctant Toronto, Suburbs combine to form megacity" in
Planning. Dec 97, Vol. 63 Issue 12, p 26-27.
Macionis, John J. and Parrillo, Vincent N. (2004). Cities and Urban Life. (3rd Ed.). Upper
Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
Roger, Keil. (2000). "Governance Restructuring in Los Angeles and Toronto:
Amalgamation or Seccession?" in International Journal of Urban & Regional Research, Dec 00, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p 758-782.
Tomalty, Ray. (1997). The Compact Metropolis: Growth Management and Intensification
in Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal. Toronto, ON: ICURR Press
2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.