Compare and contrast Parmenides' and Plato's different views of reality. Which theory do you find the most convincing?
Parmenides and Plato were both concerned with ontology (from the Greek 'onta' or being) and questioned the nature of the "real". They both concluded that the world around is a dream or an illusion and that the senses, as opposed to reason, cannot aid us in our quest for truth.
Parmenides was the first of the ancient philosophers to make use of deductive argument and he did this in order to underline the dichotomy between what was commonly believed to be true (i.e. change, motion and growth etc) and what the reason illuminates as real. In Parmenides' own words:
'But the decision about these matters lies in this: it is or it is not.'
What 'is not' cannot be for "is not" is simply a privation of "is"; it is not a piece of Being with matter and form. That which "is" is necessarily corporeal, as J Burnet explains: 'There is no real doubt that this is what we call a body. It is certainly regarded as being spatially extended for it is quite seriously spoken of as a sphere'.
For Parmenides this perfect sphere of 'being' is eternal, unchanging and immovable. There is no more of it in one part than another, it is perfectly equal and hence there can be no room for movement or growth. Melissus and Zeno developed such arguments, Zeno famously postulating the paradox of motion; if a tortoise were given a head start in a race with Achilles, Achilles would not logically be able to overtake the tortoise, despite being faster, because by the time he reaches the point where the tortoise was the tortoise will have moved ahead of that point. As long as the tortoise keeps moving it will always stay ahead, no matter how small the lead.
By the same principle...
More Comparative Philosophy & Ethics
essays:
The Views Of Reality Of Plato and Aristotle
... thus this created the all famous Plato and Aristotle Dichotomy. Plato Plato's work is very famous, and his theories are sometimes used in novels, soap operas, and movies. Plato, the older of these two philosophers, was ...
Feminism's Critique of Traditional Thinking - Comparing John Stuart Mills and Critical Essays by Will Kymlicka and Robin West
... first philosophers to provide rational responses to the two arguments for women's subjugation, thus providing much insight into the oppression and liberation of women during the 19th century. Mills states that women ...
Compare and Contrast the Philosophies of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Karl Marx
... common people can protest against an unjust ruler. Thomas Hobbes's "Leviathan" illustrates administration of natural and civil laws, as it powers many individuals who make themselves its people. "The philosophers ...
Love in Plato's Symposium
... not change it. The second example is from the speech of Pausanias out of Symposium. He states that there are two kinds of love, heavenly and common. He says that common love ... for this person so you can say that this counts and that it ...
The Role of Obligation in a Proper Moral Theory
... of creating that action. However, as previously established in the prior argument, this is not the case in a sense of duty because the sense of ... 's discussion of promises in Of the Obligation of Promises . Both of these philosophers, as well as many others, have developed theories in such a way so ...
Answers and explains questions pertaining to ethics
... everyone should act in your best interest. Even with this difference Universal ethical egoism is still a far fetched idea and not very promising in the sense that all actions you take are only morally right if they are beneficial to ...
The correlation between Ezra Pound's "Cantos" and Plato's "The Republic"
... Fu Tzu, better known to us as Confucius from China, Plato, the ancient Greek Philosopher, and Ezra Pound, the modernist Poet from the United States ... the sense of shame, and moreover will become good. (Translated by James Legge, The Great Learning)This is his way of saying that society ...
Plato and Aristotle: A comparison
... denies that this is probable. Polity, however, and occasionally aristocracy are within the realm of probability. And, Aristotle argues, justice in the less-than-perfect states is still possible because law may take the place of the philosophic ruler ...