Critical Commentary of Abba Eban's June 6th, 1967 Speech in front of the United Nations
The speech delivered by Abba Eban before the United Nations Security Council on the 6th of June, 1967 is essentially a complete justification of the Israeli cause of going to war with the Arab nations involved in the Six-Day War. In his speech, Eban thoroughly discusses the reasons for Israels decision to go to war rather than surrender to Arab interests, and Israels reason to make its preemptive military strikes against Syria, Egypt, and Jordan, and defends his nations right to do so in accordance with United Nations regulations. Ebans speech is a vital document when examining the Six Day war because it gives the reader the ability to understand the justification for most if not all of Israels military actions in the conflict, the political and economic sufferings experienced by Israel at the hands of its neighbors, and the Israeli plan to carry on in a state of peace once the conflict was resolved.
When discussing the context of Ebans speech, the entire political and battlefield atmospheres have to be taken into account, along with the very nature of the speaker himself. Eban was the first Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, and generally was a very educated and accomplished individual on matters of foreign relations, gaining experience from working in the World Zionist Organization and serving in the British Army as an intelligence officer and liaison to Jewish settlers living in Palestine. Because of his experience in handling Zionist affairs, Eban was capable of delivering his address to the United Nations concerning the Six Day War with conviction and a remarkably clear and calm tone, even though the address was delivered two days into the War, which suggested the Israelis complete confidence in handling the War victoriously. Because of Ebans efforts and performance in front of the Security Council, the speech clarified the intentions of Israel and defended her seemingly aggressive actions against her neighbors as a means to resolve what was interpreted as Arab aggression, and defined Israels intentions as peace after the conflict had been won.
Like the candid context of Ebans speech, the content was an exact and direct statement of grievances and compassion for Israels neighbors. The speech lists an extensive and direct description of the causes for Israels actions, the primary causes being the blockade of the Straits of Tiran, which Eban cited as a clear cut act of aggression:There was in this wanton act a quality of malice. For surely the closing of the Strait of Tiran gave no benefit whatever to Egypt except the perverse joy of inflicting injury on others.However, while arguing that Israel was right in going to war with all Arab nations involved, it must be recalled that he also expressed a great deal of compassion for the nation of Jordan, citing Israels view that Jordan had been intimidated against its better interests to go to war:Jordan had been intimidated, against its better interest, into joining a defense pact. It is not a defense pact at all: it is an aggressive pact Therefore, the content of Ebans speech was based on facts pertaining to the ongoing war when it was delivered. However, the speech utilizes these facts in a very persuasive manner, due to Ebans soft-spoken tone coupled with the academic nature of the language used.
Though the content of Ebans speech can be considered a slanted view on the then progressing crisis in the Middle East, the overall significance of the June 6th Speech cannot be passed over. When Abba Eban went in front of the United Nations, he fully intended to provide his nations reasons for committing to military aggression against its neighbors to the world community, and did so with great effectiveness. The speech gives a complete record of the Israeli rationale for going to war, and covers in great detail nearly every political, social, and economic grievance Israel held at the time. The speech gives a thorough overview of what the Israeli aims would be after the conflict was resolved, and gives an extensive review of the causes of Israeli military action against its neighbors. Though to a degree the Eban speech is slanted, other orations at the time, such as Nassers speech before the Egyptian National Assembly on May 29th, 1967 can be considered slanted due to Nasser listing and describing the Arabs peoples grievances towards Israel in the same manner as Eban lists and describes his grievances. Therefore, the nature of the June 6th speech can be considered factual but with a subjective nature; facts about the crisis atmosphere are described and listed, but only from the Israelis point of view.
In conclusion, Abba Ebans June 6th speech before the United Nations is a clear, concise, and persuasive address given to a global audience addressing the then-developing Six-Day War. The speech is a useful tool when investigating the causes of the War, and gives a clear and concise list of reasons for Israels actions. Also, Ebans speech defends any possible faults in Israels then-standing political strategies in waging war, and argues that Israel was well within its rights to wage war against its neighbors due to the cited breeches of United Nations protocol. Though Ebans speech is a slanted statement of fact, it gives possibly one of the best views into Israels logic for going to war, and an understanding of their plans for their peace afterwards.
Works Cited"The Six Day War 1967 - Abba Eban's Famous Speech to the UN -." Hope of Israel - Home. Mar.-Apr. 2009
More Middle Eastern History
essays:
The Six-Day War.
... instead the strong arm of Western Imperialism that so angered the Arab nationalists. (Oren 38) Israel was forced upon the Arab world by the imperialists of the west. In forming Israel, the United Nations did ...
A chronology of the Arab - Israeli conflict in the 20th Century.
... into the 1980s. THE FIRST PALESTINE WAR (1947-49) The first war began as a civil conflict between Palestinian Jews and Arabs following the United Nations recommendation of Nov. 29, 1947, to partition Palestine, then still under British mandate ...
The tomb of Tutankhamun and the daily life in ancient Egypt
... similar to the cloths that surrounded the common people. Game-boxes were another thing that was found in the tomb. You can not go a whole life without having any fun. The game ... I., British museum dictionary of ancient Egypt, London 1995Schulz, R. & Seidel, M., Egypt World of the Pharaohs, Cologne ...
The Creation of a Jewish Homeland: A Two Thousand Year Struggle
... Once the war was over the Jews increased their efforts to create their own homeland by undertaking to sabotage British communications in Palestine. Britain, realizing they had lost control of the situation in Palestine, referred the matter to the United Nations ...
A critical analysis of how Gamal Abdel-Nasser was able to play on both the American and Russian political ambitions in order to further develop his own nation's interests.
... whole world. In return Nasser decided to nationalize the Suez Canal on one end to provide cash for building the dam and on the other end because he was extremely upset at the Americans. Eventually Nasser turned to the Russians ...
Were the promises and agreements made between the Arabs, French, and British during the First World War which led to the formation of the Middle East compatible?
... from foreign aggression" , thus Iraq's status as a British protectorate is maintained. Thirdly, Britain pledges herself to try to promote Arab independence in only those territories in which she "is free to act without detriment to the interests ...
The middle east. A bloody history of conflict between the followers of Judaism and Islam. Speaks of the politics involved and Judgement day for the peace processes and
... countered the Jews claim to the land of Israel with one of their own. The United Nations granted the displaced Jews Israel, this ignited the bloody conflict between the two ...
History of Arafat and the PLO. Argues that Arafat doesn't represent the best interests of the Palestinian people.
... The United States and Great Britan criticize the Israeli government because of the number of Palestinians being killed. Later in 1988, the Palestine National Council (PNC) proclaims an independent Palestinian state in Gaza and the West bank. Arafat has begun to ...