David Hume's critique of the belief in Miracles
In explaining Hume's critique of the belief in miracles,
we must first understand the definition of a miracle. The
Webster Dictionary defines a miracle as: a supernatural event
regarded as to define action, one of the acts worked by Christ
which revealed his divinity an extremely remarkable
achievement or event, an unexpected piece of luck. Therefore,
a miracle is based on one's perception of past experiences,
what everyone sees. It is based on a individuals own reality,
and the faith in which he/she believes in, it is based on
interior events such as what we are taught, and exterior
events, such as what we hear or see first hand.
When studying Hume's view of a miracle, he interprets or
defines a miracle as such; a miracle is a violation of the
laws of nature, an event which is not normal to most of
mankind. Hume explains this point brilliantly when he states,
"Nothing is esteemed a miracle, if it has ever happened in the
common course of nature. It is no miracle that a man
seemingly in good health should die on a sudden." (Hume p.888)
Hume states that this death is quite unusual, however it
seemed to happen naturally. He could only define it as a
true miracle if this dead man were to come back to life. This
would be a miraculous event because such an experience has not
yet been commonly observed. In which case, his philosophical
view of a miracle would be true.
Hume critiques and discredits the belief in a miracle
merely because it goes against the laws of nature. Hume
defines the laws of nature to be what has been "uniformly"
observed by mankind, such as the laws of identity and gravity.
He views society as being far to liberal in what they consider...
Modern Philosophy essays:
... event because such an experience has not yet been commonly observed. In which case, his philosophical view of a miracle would be true. Hume critiques and discredits the belief in a miracle merely because it goes against the laws of nature ...
... the laws of nature. The deist God was often called, Great Architect of the Universe. The encyclopedia became the bible of the ... tired of there governments ignorance and needed a new way of thinking. The enlightened thinkers were considered dreamers, who believed that critiquing politics ...
... bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave or depending upon the will of any other man. ' (Locke 4) Locke believes that man exists in a state of nature and ...
... sequence of events and there are "laws of nature" that make the world act in ...
Social contract theorists: Hobbes vs. Rousseau This paper compares and contrasts Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau and then I discuss who I think has the stronger position and why.
... the natural result is war. The state of nature, as deemed by Hobbes, is the "natural condition of mankind" that what would exist if there were no government, no civilization, no laws, and ...
... state of nature without reason, but once he grows up and is able to obtain this intellectual feature he is able to achieve personal freedom. Locke also believed that humans have three natural rights ...
... the laws of nature and is derivative from the compilation of data and that it is needed to integrate empirically distinct groupings to help in the trend of elucidation ...
... no beginning in time, everything takes place according to the laws of nature. The same people think there is not necessarily an absolute ...