Military Customs and Courtesies
To the untrained eye there does not seem to be too many variations between the civilian world and the military world besides the evident like uniforms, stricter standards of living, and traveling. However, to the trained eye one huge difference stands out. That difference is mutual respect. The fact that mutual respect exists, and is demanded is a major difference between the civilian world and the military world. The Army has even come out with an Army Regulation, which is a manual on how to show proper respect and etiquette. The manual covers such things as personal salutes and honors, courtesy visits within the Army, and even Inter Service and Military-Civilian visits all that I think are important things to know as a future officer in the Army.
A salute is defined as "show[ing] respect and recognition to (a military superior) by assuming a prescribed position" by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary. The exact origin of the salute is unknown. It is said that the salute began in late Roman times when assassinations were rampant. When the citizens wanted to see a public official, they had to advance toward the official with their right hand raised to show that they did not have a weapon. The showing of the right hand eventually became a symbol of respect. It is also, in some form, used all around the world. Many historians think that the United States military salute derived from the "open hand" British Army salute that is palm down and toward the shoulder.
In the Army, any personnel in uniform are required to salute if they recognize persons entitled to the salute. Persons entitled to the salute include the President of the United States or Commander-in-Chief, Commissioned Officers, Warrant Officers, any Medal of Honor recipient, and Officers of friendly foreign countries. Salutes...
Reviews of: "Military Customs and Courtesies"
:
More Military & International Conflicts & Security
essays:
Failure of international aid.
... the world and so a similar standard of living could ... obvious exceptions it is acceptable to have a general view of the North and South as the "Haves" and the "Have nots" respectively. The term "inequality" is also difficult to define. It is ...
Merchants Of Death
... poor standards of living; i.e. poor public services, such ... imdb.com/title/tt0399295/AFP (06/12/06). US drives world military spending to record high. Retrieved April 9,2008, from http ...
Shay's Rebellion and the Modern Militia
... global economic restructuring, with its job losses and a declining standard of living. A series of tax revolts during the 18th century in America and the ...
Functions of the United Nations
... improve the standards of living of the world's poor. The UN works to try to bring full employment and create conditions of Economic and ... authorise military action. There are 15 members of the United Nations Security Council. Out of these 15 members, 5 are permanent. Bibliography * value="1" www.un.org ...
Is Australia's 'Pacific Solution' valid at international law?
... freedom from arbitrary detention; access to legal assistance; a quality standard of living and most importantly, appropriate protection and humanitarian assistance as an asylum seeker or ...
Sovereignty: Does it Exist?
... affairs of nations? Sovereignty as defined by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary is ... with respect to interfering in the domestic affairs of states? When a state is accused of having committed a violation of an ... World War I, it has been said that sovereignty was central ...
The Mass Media's role in influencing 'New' Terrorism.
... routinization of terrorism . . . could slowly transform standards of political expression. Exposure to terrorism may increase public tolerance to the point that terrorism becomes normal, or at least usual and ordinary." This is exactly what ...
The Effects of Modernity and the Military
... nations military to war without approval of that nation? Does the national interest come before the ideal of world peace? It is not very smart to have an army fight for something that is not national since nationalism is the thing ...
Cool essay
I liked this essay a lot. You pointed out the main difference and then elaborated on it. Good stuff man.
0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.