U.S.-India Nuclear Deal
In July of 2005, shortly after the appointment of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, the United States and India announced their intent to strike a deal on the use of nuclear materials. After two years of discussion, the two countries reached a joint agreement concerning civilian nuclear cooperation in India. Although the deal would promote a more friendly relationship between India and the United States, the agreement meets opposition by groups of both countries.
Under the new nuclear deal, India would give consent to the International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA), a supervisory group of United Nations, to access its civilian nuclear program. India, however, will decide which of its nuclear facilities are considered civilian, and fourteen of Indias twenty-two power reactors will be placed under IAEA safeguards permanently (Pan 2008). The country has promised that all future civilian reactors will be placed under the safeguards permanently as well. Exempt from inspections or safeguards will be military facilities and stockpiles of nuclear fuel that India has produced up to now. Other terms of the agreement include Indias promise to allow more intrusive IAEA inspections, to continue its refrain from testing nuclear weapons, to prevent the spread of nuclear technologies to states that do not have them, and to support nonproliferation efforts around the world (Pan 2008). In turn, American companies will be allowed to build nuclear reactors in India and provide nuclear fuel for its civilian energy program. India would buy U.S. nuclear technology and imported fuel for its nuclear reactors (Pan 2008).
Americans who advocate the U.S.-India nuclear deal reason that the agreement will bring India closer to the United States and that India will be a great ally in fighting terrorism, spreading democracy, and preventing the domination of Asia by any single power (Pan 2008). India will act as...
Reviews of: "U.S.-India Nuclear Deal"
:
More Military & International Conflicts & Security
essays:
The Nuclear Club: Ethics Of Nuclear Proliferation.
... United Nations. Faith in the governing body is paramount when dealing with nuclear technology. The International Atomic Energy Agency has the distinction of being objective and impartial in ...
Discussing the reasons on Nuclear testing in the pacific region by Britain, and France.
... of nuclear weapons on objects and "things", however, their attitude to such testing was not acceptable or appropriate. In 1957, the British Prime Minister, Harold ...
The Nuclear Posture Review: The Wrong Road to Security.
... its energies towards the abolishment of nuclear weapons as ... their nuclear programs, and focus rather on economic development. A very strong cooperation would be formed between the former nuclear powers ...
Islam and the Present War on Terrorism
... have nuclear weapon, but are not targeted. Here the suspicion arises that whether the war is actually against terrorism or ... on terrorism. Prime Minister Tony Blair visited number of countries including Pakistan, India, Oman ...
Was the 2003 war in Iraq justified and necessary?
... that it would retain a role in the long-term relationship between the UN and Iraq. 705 (15 August 1991): Iraq. "Decides ... a nuclear device internally, but later focused on importing this material. A ...
Nuclear Nightmares: Where Do We Go From Here?
... a relationship between terrorism and these materials." As anyone can see, why else would someone want to steal nuclear material other ...
U.S.A.: The Military - Industrial Complex (How the military-industrial complex had evolved and its implication on Business, Governmant and society)
... S. nuclear arsenal in parallel with international negotiations to eliminate all nuclear weapons worldwide ... that military procurement had become the focal point of the relationship between the state and the industry during the war effort. The ...
Do You Think Nuclear Weapons Should Be Kept In Our
... your prime minister or if they haven’t paid you what they owe you on the deadline and they refuse to give any money you would have a reason. I don’t know how they can start a nuclear war ... if they hit where the nuclear bombs are we will all die. I think that nuclear weapons are too dangerous and ...
Awesome
I really liked this paper, I think it was well written and honestly, it opens your eyes, I recommend it to anyone who wants to learn more.
0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.