i just check online... you sure that your title's correct?
- 29/05/2004
- 22:22:48
- Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
while your paper was very well written, it talks mainly about the comparisons between cinderella and a play that you had put up. that leaves the readers who have not seen your play ecluded from the full comprehesion of your paper
- 29/05/2004
- 21:58:19
- Score: 3 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
lots of specific support for your arguement. also, the frequent paragraph break eases readability. However, try to avoid the first person "I" in a paper.
- 29/05/2004
- 21:55:03
- Score: 2 out of 5 people found this comment useful.
your paper is very good as a quick summary or reference guide. however, it lacks details; you should explain who some of the characters, such as mollie and boxer, are
- 27/05/2004
- 22:24:55
- Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
good use of data, though it would be nice if the documents were included. also, i think you are lacking in the bias department
- 27/05/2004
- 22:16:53
- Score: 2 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
i like how you included both sides of the issue
- 27/05/2004
- 22:14:13
- Score: 9 out of 9 people found this comment useful.