User Details For: Shansue

Essay List
Comments List
  • Not bad written.. though...

    Do not forget the ramadanwar of '73, the sequel to the war of '67.You are right though, this clearly ís an essay from the Palestinian view.You should have started your essay a few hundred years earlier though, when the Palestinians first came to live in Palestine/Israel. The rightful owners?I would really like to see another essay of you in which you'll state the Jewish point of view. ^^Peace!
    • 15/01/2008
    • 07:29:10
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Work to be done...

    It sounds as if you made this essay after watching the news, but without a lot of background research. You keep on going about just óne aspect in the whole conflict actually, furthermore, you give just one argument and one conclusion out of a zillion possibilities. If you want to claim that both the Palestinians as the Israelis are guilty of terrorism, we need more evidence. Reason, facts and logic.Good luck!
    • 15/01/2008
    • 07:22:23
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Whats what?

    First of all: If i remember correctly, Israel was into the Plan-Dalet during the late 40's... I miss that part of vital information in the essay, why?Also... I doubt the war of '67 was only won because of more money. Several years later, the war was followed up by the Jom-Kippur war, which ended in a massacre. Israels enemy was supported by at least five other countries from the middle east. So money couldnt have been the biggest issue.I think you've written down the tip of the ice-berg.. Its good, but i think you could do better. ^^ Keep it up!
    • 15/01/2008
    • 07:16:38
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • So-so

    Well written, i like your style... but...Mind that Palestinians will get help from the middle-east if they would ever get attacked by European or even American troops.Your sources are also a little off.. I cant find anything from a Palestinian or Arab author among them. Thats okay if you really don't want to do research from their point of view, but please do be careful when making statements in your essay.
    • 15/01/2008
    • 07:07:04
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Think before writing

    I´m kinda pro-Israel, but your arguments really need a better foundation than this.Its really subjective and you do not give a lot of relevant facts nor reasons why a Christian should be pro- Israel.Dear friend, it is not your opinion you just want to make known to the rest of the world, you need to convince us. The only way by doing this is through real facts, logic and reason.
    • 15/01/2008
    • 06:55:17
    • Score: 0 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • The Bastille

    In your conclusion you state that the only reason why you can think of that the fall of the bastille is the most important event, is because they still celebrate it today... But why do they particularly celebrate that event today?Yes, one event led to the next, but the bastille was an absolute turning point.Did you know the bastille was the symbol of the king's power? The French revolution was about making everybody equal. The Bastille was a symbol of repression. The Fall of the Bastille symbolizes everything what the French revolution was about; equalness, brotherhood (they had to do it together, since the bastille was heavily armed) and freedom... The bastille kept a lot of "innocent" prisoners. Former patriots etc.
    • 13/12/2007
    • 10:41:50
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Yes and no

    Hmm what you write is true and yet not entirely true. You forget that America gave aid to south-america so they could get more influence in their political and economical decissions. (America was the money, South- America needed money). As a result, South- America was highly in debt of the north and they were still as dependable as always. America took what they could and south-america could not do anything about it, nor could she call for help to Europe, because they were out of the game "thanks" to the Monroe- doctrine.I agree with you on the giving aid part.Though you should also look at the peace/war- oil statistics. Venezuela for example, gives oil. When the oil prices are high, there is but little peace towards the US. When the oil prices lower, Chavez starts to call Bush his friend. Its not only America being nosy or to busy in the middle east, it may also be -unfortunatly- a political game.
    • 13/12/2007
    • 10:22:14
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.