User Details For: joecarling

Essay List
Comments List
  • Great essay

    Very detailed and academically written.
    • 24/05/2010
    • 07:11:05
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Nice essay

    Love your style
    • 23/11/2009
    • 22:14:58
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Nice essay

    I dig this
    • 15/11/2009
    • 00:45:45
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Great essay.

    Love it.
    • 15/09/2009
    • 00:42:59
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Great job.

    Good start and can be expanded to become a great piece.
    • 10/07/2009
    • 06:17:07
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Too many stats.

    Too many stats. More description needed.
    • 02/07/2009
    • 05:48:05
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Detailed report.

    digging (loving) it
    • 29/06/2009
    • 05:04:35
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Not A+

    Could do better.
    • 22/06/2009
    • 05:18:32
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Reasonable.

    Like it.
    • 16/06/2009
    • 05:21:59
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Too colloquial.

    Please be a tad more formal.
    • 02/06/2009
    • 07:28:40
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Solid and strong.

    Solid and strong.
    • 09/05/2009
    • 06:47:31
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Great

    Comprehensive report.
    • 04/05/2009
    • 05:53:33
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Reasonable.

    Could cut down on the dialogue.
    • 17/04/2009
    • 21:20:12
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Well done.

    Great detail in this piece.
    • 13/04/2009
    • 05:49:22
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • A grade essay.

    Luv it.
    • 09/04/2009
    • 06:14:26
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Not good.

    Waffly.
    • 07/04/2009
    • 08:07:27
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Reads ok.

    Reasonable essay.
    • 19/03/2009
    • 03:20:28
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Good and concise.

    Nice and clear.
    • 10/03/2009
    • 04:46:51
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Tank essay.

    Good stuff.
    • 09/03/2009
    • 01:54:50
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Great detail.

    Love the essay.
    • 04/03/2009
    • 06:55:12
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Please Translate.

    Thank you.
    • 03/03/2009
    • 02:56:51
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Ok but could improve.

    Tends to be a bit boring.
    • 27/02/2009
    • 05:05:31
    • Score: 0 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Bad.

    Lacks detail
    • 23/02/2009
    • 02:58:07
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Slam Dunc Essay.

    Insane.
    • 17/02/2009
    • 03:13:11
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Lame

    Lame as.
    • 15/02/2009
    • 01:13:47
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Great essay with reliable bibliography.

    Great use of resources.
    • 11/02/2009
    • 06:22:44
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Great essay.

    Lots and lots of detail. Well done.
    • 10/02/2009
    • 03:01:21
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Reads satisfactory.

    B grade.
    • 07/02/2009
    • 18:20:55
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Excellent analysis.

    Great detail with lots of depth.
    • 04/02/2009
    • 03:11:28
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Good depth.

    Great stuff.
    • 31/01/2009
    • 01:06:36
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Excellent essay.

    Loads of info.
    • 29/01/2009
    • 06:10:28
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • What Film?

    What film is this?
    • 25/01/2009
    • 22:45:33
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Ok but where is your argument.

    This piece lacks a proper purpose.
    • 25/01/2009
    • 12:43:51
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Sounds great.

    Reads like a good essay.
    • 22/01/2009
    • 21:33:48
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Not good enough.

    Not good enough for a 9th grade. Reads like a 7th grade.
    • 20/01/2009
    • 14:29:40
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Well written.

    Heaps of good detail.
    • 19/01/2009
    • 17:07:49
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Good detail.

    Reads OK.
    • 16/01/2009
    • 20:11:02
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Way too short.

    Needs heaps more detail.
    • 12/01/2009
    • 22:24:51
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Great work.

    Like the detail.
    • 08/01/2009
    • 12:31:55
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Superbly written.

    Loads and loads of detail well done.
    • 03/01/2009
    • 20:48:29
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Reasonable essay.

    Short but covers a lot of ground.
    • 31/12/2008
    • 22:37:57
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • English please.

    Lost in translation. Please use English.
    • 29/12/2008
    • 15:15:12
    • Score: 0 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Great detail.

    Well done. Lots of detail.
    • 28/12/2008
    • 21:30:16
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Great work.

    Very detailed.
    • 26/12/2008
    • 00:46:21
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Ok but a bit short.

    I like where you are heading but you could elaborate a bit more.
    • 16/12/2008
    • 20:35:09
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Brief but good.

    Good effort.
    • 14/12/2008
    • 23:56:20
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Worth its B- grade

    You get what you deserve.
    • 13/12/2008
    • 23:48:18
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Great job.

    Great summary. Well done.
    • 28/11/2008
    • 21:47:41
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Great job.

    Well done in a small lengthed essay.
    • 26/11/2008
    • 21:38:57
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Great work.

    Great with lots of detail.
    • 24/11/2008
    • 20:56:41
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Ok analysis.

    Ok but don't use wikipedia.
    • 19/11/2008
    • 22:51:39
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Satisfactory.

    OK effort but could expand a bit more.
    • 18/11/2008
    • 14:14:17
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Ok for middle school.

    Great start but needs more detail and bibliography.
    • 16/11/2008
    • 23:04:14
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Great job but don't use wikipedia

    Great job but don't use wikipedia in your bibliography.
    • 06/11/2008
    • 00:34:45
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Satisfactory description.

    Satisfactory description.
    • 03/11/2008
    • 22:59:33
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Good points made.

    I like the points that you have made but it does need to be a tad longer.
    • 31/10/2008
    • 00:12:59
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Boring story

    Plain boring with little excitement or suspenseful moments.
    • 23/10/2008
    • 22:31:51
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Fair summary

    Fair summary but could be in more detail. You should also analyse the language features used in your chosen text.
    • 23/10/2008
    • 22:10:15
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Plain bad.

    Too short. Lacks detail. Not an essay.
    • 19/10/2008
    • 21:29:22
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Good effort

    A good piece of writing. Good detail considering that you have only looked at the first chapter of this book.
    • 07/10/2008
    • 17:17:57
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Too short

    This piece has the potential to become a longer and better essay.
    • 01/10/2008
    • 22:13:24
    • Score: 0 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Too short

    Way too short to be a good essay.
    • 01/10/2008
    • 22:11:44
    • Score: 0 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Way too short.

    This essay needs more depth.
    • 01/09/2008
    • 03:44:55
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Too short

    This essay is too short and requires more depth.
    • 17/08/2008
    • 02:42:58
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • This may be a good essay but it needs a translation to English

    This may be a good essay but it needs a translation to English. It probably needs to be a bit longer as well.
    • 16/08/2008
    • 16:53:48
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • A boring story.

    This piece of writing is very boring. More effort, detail and length is required.
    • 13/08/2008
    • 05:22:39
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Way too short

    This essay is way too short. It needs to be more detailed.
    • 11/08/2008
    • 00:05:01
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Excellent essay but try not to use Wikipedia as a resource.

    This is an excellent essay with great length and detail. However, try not to use Wikipedia as a resource as it may be unreliable at times.
    • 06/08/2008
    • 03:13:51
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Average attempt

    This is an ordinary essay. More content and depth could be included in this essay.
    • 23/06/2008
    • 02:14:35
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Good attempt but thesis needs a bit of work.

    Your analysis is good but you need to develop a good thesis and link your analysis back to the thesis. Nevertheless, a good mature effort.
    • 10/06/2008
    • 22:51:25
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Very detailed

    A very detailed case study. Well done.
    • 10/06/2008
    • 22:44:51
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Lacks in content

    This piece of writing lacks in content and does not include an in-depth analysis of the poem. A much longer essay of about 1000 words is required in order to convey your point strongly.
    • 02/06/2008
    • 01:58:06
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Good essay

    Considering that you are writing at a year 11 level, this is a good essay that covers many aspects of Hinduism. Well done.
    • 02/06/2008
    • 01:53:55
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Average attempt but this attempt does not hold the appropriate language used in an information or analytical report

    It seems like you have written a recount more than a report. You have frequently used the first person point of view and this is not ideal when writing information reports. There are good points in the form of a table but expression needs to be improved.
    • 02/06/2008
    • 01:50:19
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Not a creative piece of story

    Although this story is set in the future (2009), there is little tension in the story. You need to develop a good climax, minimize the dialogue, use more descriptive language and include a few cliffhangers.
    • 02/06/2008
    • 01:47:23
    • Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
  • Average descriptive analysis

    This analysis has some good points made in it. However, it is way too short. You should aim towards 1000 words at least. In addition. better sentence structure and more complex diction is required in this essay.
    • 28/05/2008
    • 01:42:34
    • Score: 6 out of 6 people found this comment useful.
  • Average essay

    The language in this essay is not formal enough and is not strong enough to convey the main points. The essay sounds biased and should be neutral in order to get the highest marks.
    • 23/02/2008
    • 17:50:20
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Excellent story

    Excellent story with good use of figurative language and imagery. However, the story is a bit long.
    • 23/02/2008
    • 17:12:59
    • Score: 0 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Average Description

    This description appears to be an average level because the language used is not very complex and there is a lack of terminology used. "Vectors" can be used instead of "lines".
    • 23/02/2008
    • 17:05:19
    • Score: 6 out of 9 people found this comment useful.
  • Not up to standard

    This essay is not thorough enough and seems to be only on the surface. The language is not formal enough and does not meet the standard of a college undergraduate. It seems like an essay written by a high school student 10th grade.
    • 23/02/2008
    • 16:59:38
    • Score: 9 out of 11 people found this comment useful.