User Details For: oldcowhand

Essay List
Comments List
  • Very thorough!

    This is an extremely thorough plan. Excellent!
    • 22/08/2004
    • 10:42:45
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Where is the documentation and appendices?

    The literature review is extremely poor, and only copies text directly from S&P and NASDSAQ Web sites. No studies or actual literature is cited anywhere in the review.All of the statistical analysis is missing.
    • 19/01/2004
    • 19:55:44
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Conclusion could use some refinement

    The conclusion is a bit abrupt, and could use some refinement. The research is excellent, but needs to be fleshed out significantly.
    • 23/12/2003
    • 13:43:44
    • Score: 4 out of 4 people found this comment useful.
  • Dry, but a good foundation of information

    The use of passive voice and dry presentation of the material makes for tough reading. However, the paper more than makes up for it in its thorough presentation and detailed analysis.
    • 28/11/2003
    • 11:08:44
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • No works cited!

    The author has used passive voice throughout (including "there will", "there is", etc.)The paper also has no works cited, though most of this must have come from a source SOMEWHERE.
    • 17/11/2003
    • 10:38:24
    • Score: 7 out of 7 people found this comment useful.
  • Works cited?

    The grammar on this could be cleaned up a bit, but the content is good.However, the thesis fails to cite ANY other work. All of the statistics and the quotes had to come from somewhere!
    • 17/11/2003
    • 10:35:31
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.