Did not flow as well as could have. Needs to be worked on a bit more.
- 11/11/2008
- 07:35:50
- Score: 0 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
Well done, not sure what level, would assume early high school. Seems the author had a good grasp on concepts. Written well.
- 11/11/2008
- 07:34:16
- Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
I enjoyed the story, but think the contrast and comparison could have been presented with more of a flow... let the ready know how they were the same... etc.the references are weak.
- 11/11/2008
- 07:32:16
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
I am not sure what level this is supposed to be written at, but it seems to be unacceptable as it is not complete. Grammar, structure and style are all off. Maybe ESL?
- 11/11/2008
- 07:16:42
- Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
this paper is written well and it seems the author has a good grasp on APA formatting.
- 11/11/2008
- 07:14:56
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
This is a middle school essay and is good, as such. Need to add some credibility through listing of references.
- 11/11/2008
- 07:12:29
- Score: 1 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
There are no references to this paper, useless.
- 28/07/2008
- 17:01:44
- Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
Interesting fact, but no references to back them up. Should be formatted as an essay, with intro, body, conclusion and reference page.
- 06/07/2008
- 09:22:19
- Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
Good starting point to a great paper.
- 06/07/2008
- 09:18:41
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
Well written and good use of references in this comprehensive paper.
- 06/07/2008
- 09:15:46
- Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
This essay has great use of references, is comprehensive, and well written.
- 06/07/2008
- 09:14:09
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
This is a rare find here. Great work. Complete.
- 01/07/2008
- 11:45:08
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
Grammatical errors (do not use "we" in term papers.Fonts did not print correctly.References not in correct format.
- 01/07/2008
- 11:41:54
- Score: 3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
Information seems well organized, but there are direct quotes with no references and the reference section is only links. What happened to the author, year, title of article, etc? rate this one fair.
- 01/07/2008
- 11:39:12
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
Seems to be a great start, but is missing more references. Where does this information come from? Only lists one and it is not referenced in the body. Confusing.
- 01/07/2008
- 11:36:03
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
Just a list of "facts" no references, not a paper. Missing introduction, body and conclusion - maybe this was supposed to be some sort of table?
- 01/07/2008
- 11:33:41
- Score: 3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
May be a bit too long, has incredible references listed.
- 13/05/2008
- 19:47:46
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
I would recommend that the sentences be checked for grammar and reworded to flow better. References are awesome, just check to make sure that all of them are APA format.
- 13/05/2008
- 19:44:16
- Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
This paper is well thought out.Very strong and tied together well.
- 13/05/2008
- 19:40:08
- Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
I suggest more succinct information in tables and if the author had used outside resources, would have been better.
- 13/05/2008
- 19:37:01
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
Other wise good paper. Need to provide references for validity.
- 01/05/2008
- 22:34:54
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
There are no citations and not reference section. This is useless to me.
- 01/05/2008
- 22:24:03
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
Well researched and written.
- 01/05/2008
- 22:16:14
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
Well written, clear definitions, good references.
- 26/04/2008
- 17:50:58
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
There are some run on sentences, poor grammar and mistakes that I think make this a less than perfect paper.
- 26/04/2008
- 17:48:05
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
there is not conclusion that ties into what should be an hypothesis. Too much time spent on the interview which is not supported with data.
- 26/04/2008
- 17:40:31
- Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
clearly defined and made easy to understand. Well done paper.
- 26/04/2008
- 17:34:36
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
... just need to be sure that references are cited properly in the text.
- 20/04/2008
- 15:05:50
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.
I do not agree with all your answers.
- 20/04/2008
- 15:02:52
- Score: 0 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
No form, no structure, not an essay. What are the (numbers) all about, they do not tie into your references. Junk!
- 20/04/2008
- 14:55:10
- Score: 0 out of 0 people found this comment useful.