User Details For: shakesphere

Essay List
Comments List
  • Nice interpretation.

    I have also seen this play enacted by many ametur and professional actors and it is a wonderful piece of work... But to comment on your essay, it is a pretty good infact one the the most accurate interpretations of it.
    • 06/11/2005
    • 12:31:23
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • Perfect title

    great job. this essay has the perfect title to describe animal farm. Good job solid work. nicely done. but a 100 in the 12 grade what r u kiddin me. if i was ur teacher i would probably give u a 95. 100s r only for marx and orwell and extraordianary essays. but this essay is really really good
    • 24/05/2003
    • 21:09:45
    • Score: 1 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Nice essay

    good job with this essay. even though i dont understand how animal farm is a portrayal of the cold war it is a metaphor of the russian revolution. but u did a great job with this essay. u certainly deserved a little more than a 71 may be a 80. good job though
    • 24/05/2003
    • 21:01:37
    • Score: 1 out of 1 people found this comment useful.
  • 95%

    I cant believe you got a 95 on this paper no offence. Needs a lot of improvement.
    • 17/05/2003
    • 19:27:40
    • Score: 4 out of 9 people found this comment useful.
  • Again explain

    If u rate my essay as poor, please explain why u did so. Just comment as to why u rated my essay as poor.
    • 13/04/2003
    • 10:44:36
    • Score: 5 out of 5 people found this comment useful.
  • Explain

    whoever rated my essay poor could u please state why and reply to this comment.
    • 13/04/2003
    • 10:40:47
    • Score: 5 out of 6 people found this comment useful.
  • Very well done

    Wonderful essay. u have done a great job writing this essay. explaining Laurence fishburne's Othello in a wonderful manner and in 2158 words. the bottom line is that this is a great essay. good job.
    • 13/04/2003
    • 10:38:51
    • Score: 5 out of 5 people found this comment useful.
  • Wonderful essay

    Great essay man a lot of facts and opnions just great. Personaly i think it could have been longer. but a great essay.
    • 12/04/2003
    • 09:43:46
    • Score: 2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.
  • Good job

    good paper great essay loads of information good job. keep it up
    • 11/04/2003
    • 19:50:26
    • Score: 7 out of 7 people found this comment useful.
  • Good Job

    I totally agree with masterpuppet i donot think there would be peace between those two countries. Peace is a thing of the past for them unless a miracle.
    • 06/04/2003
    • 09:43:04
    • Score: 39 out of 42 people found this comment useful.
  • Great Essay

    you r describing a lot of diffrent cultures in an almost perfect manner just like Joseph Campbell did Great essay man i give it a 9.2
    • 06/04/2003
    • 09:23:12
    • Score: 5 out of 5 people found this comment useful.
  • He Got my point

    that is exactly what i was trying to say.
    • 30/03/2003
    • 21:26:02
    • Score: 3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
  • Good but not on point and lack of information.

    Good essay man but you donot have enough information. But a good essay. i give it a 7.4.
    • 25/03/2003
    • 19:09:47
    • Score: 3 out of 3 people found this comment useful.
  • Great essay masterpuppet

    wonderful essay right on point. lots of ill facts and points keep it up. i give it a 9.8
    • 02/03/2003
    • 10:28:11
    • Score: 34 out of 43 people found this comment useful.
  • Great...

    that was a great essay, however i suggest you post this as an article. and get more points
    • 01/03/2003
    • 08:09:02
    • Score: 7 out of 7 people found this comment useful.
  • Great essay

    i love this essay it has what i call "the 4P's" the 4 principles in writing a good essay1.good introduction2.good body3.a conclusion4.your opnionand in this essay you could find almost all of the 4 p's. This essay is good i give it a 9.5
    • 28/02/2003
    • 19:09:43
    • Score: 8 out of 8 people found this comment useful.
  • Great perspective...

    That was a close to perfect essay on the pros and cons of what will/what is happening with the rapid expansion E*Trade in China. This essay covers most the effects that e-trade will have on china with a lack of bias.However i believe that this essay can be improved if the author(depending on his/her situation) would add the effects on chineese society(chineese people would become more modern),the effects on american/european economies, and also the issue of creating a minuman wage for the common chinnese worker throgh a treaty. And also about the issue of how the computer trend is. In India for example there was this computer boom and because of this many yound people started taking computer education in colleges, but what happened then was that there was a rapid decline of the computer trend and many students were stranded without a job. you see in countries like china, india the greatest influence that a student can have in choosing his carrier is money and that is a problum. And finally i would rate this essay about 9.2/10. Every pice of literature ever written cannot explain every aspect of it's subject and this is no exception.
    • 26/02/2003
    • 17:53:47
    • Score: 23 out of 23 people found this comment useful.
  • Interesting

    i like your nice essay, one thing i would ask should we have all that moral trainig for soldiers today.
    • 24/02/2003
    • 17:06:25
    • Score: 7 out of 8 people found this comment useful.
  • Great

    no wonder you got a 91 on this essay, just curious to know what college you go to. i agree with most of the stuff in here, although i could read the whole article for some reason it is cut in the middle. but one thing i would like to say is that i believe that one of the primary reasons of why war seems justyfiable for bush and most of the american public is the fact that iraq is too small a power for america and we can eliminate it without a hitch without suffering a lot of damage. consider this situation, if america were to be like india a country which is capable of defeating iraq but would suffer a lot of economic damage from the war is war justifiable now.one other thing is the fact that in a war soldiers of iraq are will not be totally willing to figt most of them i guess will be recruited by a draft, thy would go and fight, is it justifiable to kill them, even the U.N and the red cross dont care about these soldiers and they are forced to kill themselved because america is invading their country and the only thing they did wrong is being born in iraq. one of the hardest thing in a war is to look at a mother whose child has gone to war and was killed we all know how painful that is but fail to relize that millions of mothers whose sons were seized from them because of a draft and were killed because the u.s decided to attack and they had to defend their country will would for certain be defeated. one other thing is how clevr the U.S is it first sends weapons inspectors to destory the best iraq has atleast to an extent gather enermous amounts of intelegence and attack iraq then is that fair. choosing an enemy who is not your size in itself is not fair.
    • 23/02/2003
    • 22:08:08
    • Score: 8 out of 12 people found this comment useful.
  • Great...

    now that was a good essay describing the attrocities done in the holocast. i just want to say that the vedas of the aryan race which hitler mis interpreted so not speak for the aryan race, he just said that he wanted to glorify the aryan race just to unite his people for war. it is demonstrated when india was bombed by japan an hitler's allay. india is 50-80% aryan
    • 23/02/2003
    • 21:50:39
    • Score: 6 out of 7 people found this comment useful.
  • Great essay...

    humm so gunpowder did make a lot of diffrence. it is interesting here to note that after people brought gun powder from china i guess it was first incorperated into the primary weapon of that time i.e siege. then it travelled down the ladder to the ground human troops.
    • 23/02/2003
    • 21:34:48
    • Score: 7 out of 7 people found this comment useful.
  • Reminds me...

    Now that was a perfect lesson on siege warfare, and now the game Age Of empires 2 which i play very often makes total sence. my opponents always build a lot of huge casseles and most of the time the primary objective of the game is to destroy them. i always use my trebuchet, guarded by a few knights to siege my opponent's caseles. again even here my opponent uses too much of his resource to guard his cassle so i go arround and destroy the barracks,stable,some houses,the archery range to the point that he is too weakened and i finally destroy the castle. this again reattrates the fact that you should not get carried away with one developtment in your society. for some reason i like this kind of warfare, it's so exiciting unlike today's war which i hate. there may be many inconsistincies in this review as i am an amataur at this, if any content here offends you i am sorry.
    • 23/02/2003
    • 21:17:11
    • Score: 12 out of 12 people found this comment useful.
  • Interesting...

    One thing i find reyally interesting in this essay is the fact that in each of the societies listed above we notice that they develop a revolutanary system of warfare as a necessity, they succeed and they they forget about their enemy, i.e once they develop a great system of warfare with which they defeat their enemy they tend to hold on to that same system of warfare, developing it more and more, they forget the fact that you need to keep on developing new things to stay on top of your enemy, and if you have only one system of warfare you enemy finds it's achelley's foot.
    • 23/02/2003
    • 20:50:11
    • Score: 9 out of 9 people found this comment useful.
  • Interesting...

    One thing i find reyally interesting in this essay is the fact that in each of the societies listed above we notice that they develop a revolutanary system of warfare as a necessity, they succeed and they they forget about their enemy, i.e once they develop a great system of warfare with which they defeat their enemy they tend to hold on to that same system of warfare, developing it more and more, they forget the fact that you need to keep on developing new things to stay on top of your enemy, as if you have only one system of warfare you enemy finds it's achelley's foot.
    • 23/02/2003
    • 20:48:21
    • Score: 7 out of 8 people found this comment useful.
  • Not a good introduction

    humm, this essay is loaded with names, and principles which i as an amatuaur fail to understand. i believe that it would be better if you include a good introduction so that an amatuaur like me will be interested in reading you essay
    • 23/02/2003
    • 20:02:20
    • Score: 8 out of 16 people found this comment useful.
  • Humm too general

    Well, i guess it would be better if you add more history. the title says \"brief american history\" but it ignores some very important parts of american history i.e history of the U.S before independence and history of the us during and post world wars.
    • 23/02/2003
    • 19:38:30
    • Score: 8 out of 8 people found this comment useful.