WWII

I know that it is actually "illegal" to write that, but... are u russian? Coz CCCR is spelled USSR in english. I know that for sure, coz i am from Russia but i live in Australia now

The majority of this is correct, but you also have a lot of points that are not. I wish I had my notes with me, as I just studied this subject and took a test on it, but my teacher collected them on Friday to do a notebook check. For instance, in the Munich agreement, the deal was that there would be no stopping him from invading Checkeslovakia. They were invaded by Hitler.

In the Nazi-Soviet Pact, it is good that you mentioned that France and Britain would be left to fight Germany, but it is not true that you mentioned alone. You should also have mentioned that this would keep Germany from fighting a two-front war. As for the advantages for U.S.S.R, you are very brief about it. You need to mention important details! For instance, the two main ones were that Russia would be able to hold off on the war with Germany, and that they would gain land in Poland. Good you mentioned those, but like I said, details. Russia wanted the land in Poland because Russia knew from WWI how destructive modern war was, and with the land in Poland, any war with Germany could be fought off Russian soil. Though it didn't turn out that way, that was the way of thinking Russia had. Russia did trust Britain and France, it is that Russia was being asked by Germany to ally as well. Russia recieved the best deal with Germany, so it sided with Germany, even though they did plan to ally with the Allied Powers in the future.

You should also have mentioned the Spanish Civil War as a cause for WWII. The reason Germany was involved in the Spanish Civil War was to test new modern war strategies. However, these war strategies caused thousands of civilian casaulties.

Good that you mentioned the League of Nations, but no details! Japan's invasion of Manchuria was the first evidence of The League's weakness. Because it was realised the League could do nothing but frown at what Japan did, many nations became fearful and started rearming themselves.

When you mentioned that the Treaty of Versailles should have been made in a favorable stand point towards Hitler, this is incorrect. The point of the treaty was to minimize Germany's chances of initiating another war. The fault was that the treaty was not enforced. France and Britian did make a mistake in misjudging Hitler, but not as a tyrant. They misjudged his military power. They thought he was much stronger than he really was. France and Britain did not want a war because they were in a depression. They instead, tried to post-pone any war by allowing Hitler to do what he did.

Another point that you have wrong, is that the Chamberlain trusted Hitler. He had no trust for Hitler. He just had hope to not start another war. Chamberlain, as well as the other leaders, saw what happened during modern war. Many were in fact in World War I. They knew what war could do, and did their best to stop another from happening.

Besides above, just a few mistakes you should have caught during a simple proof-read.

-in addition, France and Britain mist chances to stop Hitler.

I suppose that should be "missed" instead of "mist"

-Britain and France's mistakes, played a pole in the cause of the Second World War

I suppose that should be "role" instead of "pole"

Just a few things here and there as well. Overall though, you should recheck more of your "facts" including what I have mentioned. Otherwise, fairled "ok" as a very rough overview.

That really helped me a lot with some parts of a essay i am writing now!